From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751805AbdH2JBs (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 29 Aug 2017 05:01:48 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:50184 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751368AbdH2JBq (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 29 Aug 2017 05:01:46 -0400
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:01:30 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
        david@fromorbit.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net, oleg@redhat.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] lockdep: Fix workqueue crossrelease annotation
Message-ID: <20170829090130.m5zarou3t3tjfjlf@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20170823115843.662056844@infradead.org>
 <20170823121432.990701317@infradead.org>
 <20170829064637.GC3240@X58A-UD3R>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170829064637.GC3240@X58A-UD3R>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:46:38PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:

> How does a maintainer choose a very work-around method and avoid
> problems rather than fix a root cause? I am very disappointed.

Time.. we need this sorted before we push the whole lot to Linus in the
next window. Fixing the recursive-read thing is far more work (although
Boqun did post some patches for that, which I still have to look at).