From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Benc Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] nsh: headers, GSO Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:44:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20170830094458.5564ec0b@griffin> References: <20170829.151707.1911972805135395713.davem@davemloft.net> <20170830052303.GA109175@cran64.bj.intel.com> <20170830092040.61e5f09b@griffin> <20170830071936.GA111152@cran64.bj.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "e@erig.me" , "jan.scheurich@ericsson.com" , "blp@ovn.org" To: "Yang, Yi" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34812 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751186AbdH3HpC (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 03:45:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170830071936.GA111152@cran64.bj.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:19:37 +0800, Yang, Yi wrote: > Do you mean we need move push_nsh from net/openvswitch/actions.c to > net/nsh/nsh.c in order that kernel can load nsh kernel module > automatically? Yes. Without that struct sw_flow_key parameter but that's obvious. Jiri