From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:35:42 +0200
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] syscalls/mbind: cleanup and rewrite
 mbind01 into new API
In-Reply-To: <740583648.6098356.1504102136816.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
References: <20170829153509.12613-1-pvorel@suse.cz>
 <20170829153509.12613-2-pvorel@suse.cz>
 <4aff45ce-f45f-147d-e9c2-80eca59d74ec@redhat.com>
 <20170830123729.txs276jj5aus7qne@dell5510>
 <740583648.6098356.1504102136816.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170830143542.xigsd3b6f4npam6r@x230>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

Hi Jan,

> > I'm ok with all but this one. It's needed for a first case
> > (POLICY_DESC(MPOL_DEFAULT),),
> > no mater whether it's first or not. So I didn't put expected_nodemask to it
> > in my v3. Or
> > am I'm missing something.

> It's not needed, because we compare against "empty_nodemask"
> in this case. "nodemask" is not used at all. mbind() doesn't use
> any mask (in test_none()) and numa_bitmask_equal() compares
> "getnodemask" with "empty_nodemask".

Thanks for an explanation. Please push it all.


Kind regards,
Petr