From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44275) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dn2e4-0007FX-Br for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:03:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dn2e1-0001ze-7u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:03:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dn2e1-0001zL-1t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:02:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:02:47 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20170830155528-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20170824192730.8440-1-dgilbert@redhat.com> <20170824192730.8440-2-dgilbert@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170824192730.8440-2-dgilbert@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 01/32] vhu: vu_queue_started List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, a.perevalov@samsung.com, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com, aarcange@redhat.com, felipe@nutanix.com > Subject: Re: [RFC v2 01/32] vhu: vu_queue_started I mean, how did we end up with "vhu"? I never meant that to happen :( It's merely in the commit title but maybe we can come up with a better-sounding way to abbreviate vhost user. -- MST