From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
david@fromorbit.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net, oleg@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] lockdep: Fix workqueue crossrelease annotation
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 11:47:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170901094747.iv6s532ccuuzpry2@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170901020512.GK3240@X58A-UD3R>
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 11:05:12AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:34:53AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:15:01PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > It's not important. Ok, check the following, instead:
> > >
> > > context X context Y
> > > --------- ---------
> > > wait_for_completion(C)
> > > acquire(A)
> > > release(A)
> > > process_one_work()
> > > acquire(B)
> > > release(B)
> > > work->fn()
> > > complete(C)
> > >
> > > We don't need to lose C->A and C->B dependencies unnecessarily.
> >
> > I really can't be arsed about them. Its really only the first few works
> > that will retain that dependency anyway, even if you were to retain
> > them.
>
> Wrong.
>
> Every 'work' doing complete() for different classes of completion
> variable suffers from losing valuable dependencies, every time, not
> first few ones.
The moment you overrun the history array its gone. So yes, only the
first few works will ever see them
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-01 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 11:58 [PATCH 0/4] workqueue and lockdep stuffs Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-23 11:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: Use TASK_IDLE Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-23 13:31 ` Tejun Heo
2017-08-23 11:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] lockdep/selftests: Add mixed read-write ABBA tests Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-23 11:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] workqueue/lockdep: Fix flush_work() annotation Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-23 11:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] lockdep: Fix workqueue crossrelease annotation Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-24 2:18 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-24 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-25 1:11 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-29 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-29 14:23 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Untangle xhlock history save/restore from task independence tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] lockdep: Fix workqueue crossrelease annotation Byungchul Park
2017-08-29 18:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-30 2:09 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-30 7:41 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-30 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-30 9:01 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-30 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-30 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-30 9:35 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-30 9:24 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-30 11:25 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-30 12:49 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-31 7:26 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-31 8:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-31 8:15 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-31 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 2:05 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-01 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-09-01 10:16 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-01 12:09 ` 박병철/선임연구원/SW Platform(연)AOT팀(byungchul.park@lge.com)
2017-09-01 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 13:51 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-01 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-04 1:30 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-04 2:08 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-04 11:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 0:38 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-05 7:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 7:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 8:57 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-05 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 10:31 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-05 10:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 11:24 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-05 10:58 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-05 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 23:52 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-06 0:42 ` Boqun Feng
2017-09-06 1:32 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-06 23:59 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-07 0:11 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-06 0:48 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-05 8:30 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-31 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-25 4:39 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-29 6:46 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-29 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-29 16:12 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-23 13:32 ` [PATCH 0/4] workqueue and lockdep stuffs Tejun Heo
2017-08-23 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170901094747.iv6s532ccuuzpry2@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.