From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753855AbdIGCzZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2017 22:55:25 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:52077 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753828AbdIGCzY (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2017 22:55:24 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,356,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="897872624" Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 10:57:29 +0800 From: Yu Chen To: Dan Williams Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Thomas Gleixner , X86 ML , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rui Zhang , LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4][RFC v2] x86/apic: Spread the vectors by choosing the idlest CPU Message-ID: <20170907025728.GB18130@localhost.localdomain> References: <20170906041337.GC23250@localhost.localdomain> <20170906061545.GA20519@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:46:17AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 12:13:38PM +0800, Yu Chen wrote: > >> I agree, the driver could be rewritten, but it might take some time, so > >> meanwhile I'm looking at also other possible optimization. > > > > Which driver are we talking about anyway? Let's start looking at it > > and fix the issue there. > > As far as I understand, it's already fixed there: > > commit 7c9ae7f053e9e896c24fd23595ba369a5fe322e1 > Author: Carolyn Wyborny > Date: Tue Jun 20 15:16:53 2017 -0700 > > i40e: Fix for trace found with S4 state > > This patch fixes a problem found in systems when entering > S4 state. This patch fixes the problem by ensuring that > the misc vector's IRQ is disabled as well. Without this > patch a stack trace can be seen upon entering S4 state. > > However this seems like something that should be handled generically > in the irq-core especially since commit c5cb83bb337c > "genirq/cpuhotplug: Handle managed IRQs on CPU hotplug" was headed in > that direction. It's otherwise non-obvious when a driver needs to > release and re-acquire interrupts or be reworked to use managed > interrupts. Yes, thanks for the explaination! I did not notice this patch has been merged already. I'm using the normal CPU hotplug to reproduce the issue: #!/bin/bash n=1 while [ $n -le 31 ] do echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${n}/online n=$(( n+1 )) done Thanks, Yu