From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14 Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 00:09:43 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20170908070943.GA26549@infradead.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1709081448090.7880@namei.org> The reason why I send out the original version of this patch is because IMA used to call ->read under i_rwsem, and that deadlocked on XFS and NFS, or ext3/4 with DAX. The call path for that is process_measurement (takes i_rwsem) -> ima_collect_measurement -> ima_calc_file_hash -> ima_calc_file_ahash / ima_calc_file_shash -> ima_calc_file_hash_atfm / ima_calc_file_hash_tfm -> integrity_kernel_read ima_check_last_writer (takes i_rwsem) -> ima_update_xattr -> ima_collect_measurement -> (as above) But yes, for the init-time integrity_read_file this is incorrect. It never tripped up, and I explicitly added the lockdep annotations so that anything would show up, and it's been half a year since I sent that first RFC patch..
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig) To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: [GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14 Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 00:09:43 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20170908070943.GA26549@infradead.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1709081448090.7880@namei.org> The reason why I send out the original version of this patch is because IMA used to call ->read under i_rwsem, and that deadlocked on XFS and NFS, or ext3/4 with DAX. The call path for that is process_measurement (takes i_rwsem) -> ima_collect_measurement -> ima_calc_file_hash -> ima_calc_file_ahash / ima_calc_file_shash -> ima_calc_file_hash_atfm / ima_calc_file_hash_tfm -> integrity_kernel_read ima_check_last_writer (takes i_rwsem) -> ima_update_xattr -> ima_collect_measurement -> (as above) But yes, for the init-time integrity_read_file this is incorrect. It never tripped up, and I explicitly added the lockdep annotations so that anything would show up, and it's been half a year since I sent that first RFC patch.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-08 7:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-09-04 10:29 [GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14 James Morris 2017-09-04 10:29 ` James Morris 2017-09-07 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds 2017-09-07 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds 2017-09-08 4:48 ` James Morris 2017-09-08 4:48 ` James Morris 2017-09-08 7:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message] 2017-09-08 7:09 ` Christoph Hellwig 2017-09-08 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds 2017-09-08 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds 2017-09-08 17:36 ` Paul Moore 2017-09-08 17:36 ` Paul Moore 2017-09-10 4:32 ` James Morris 2017-09-10 4:32 ` James Morris 2017-09-10 4:53 ` James Morris 2017-09-10 4:53 ` James Morris 2017-09-11 22:30 ` Paul Moore 2017-09-11 22:30 ` Paul Moore 2017-09-14 21:09 ` Kees Cook 2017-09-14 21:09 ` Kees Cook 2017-09-14 21:13 ` James Morris 2017-09-14 21:13 ` James Morris 2017-09-14 21:25 ` Kees Cook 2017-09-14 21:25 ` Kees Cook 2017-09-08 19:57 ` James Morris 2017-09-08 19:57 ` James Morris 2017-09-17 7:36 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-09-17 7:36 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-09-10 8:10 ` Christoph Hellwig 2017-09-10 8:10 ` Christoph Hellwig 2017-09-10 14:02 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-09-10 14:02 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-09-11 6:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2017-09-11 6:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2017-09-11 21:34 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-09-11 21:34 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-09-08 22:38 ` Theodore Ts'o 2017-09-08 22:38 ` Theodore Ts'o 2017-09-10 2:08 ` James Morris 2017-09-10 2:08 ` James Morris 2017-09-10 7:13 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-09-10 7:13 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-09-10 12:17 ` Theodore Ts'o 2017-09-10 12:17 ` Theodore Ts'o 2017-09-10 6:46 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-09-10 6:46 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20170908070943.GA26549@infradead.org \ --to=hch@infradead.org \ --cc=jmorris@namei.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.