All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: dave@stgolabs.net, dbueso@suse.de, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [merged] procfs-use-faster-rb_first_cached.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:42:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170911194204.7GG1BMN-D%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: procfs: use faster rb_first_cached()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     procfs-use-faster-rb_first_cached.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: procfs: use faster rb_first_cached()

...  such that we can avoid the tree walks to get the node with the
smallest key.  Semantically the same, as the previously used rb_first(),
but O(1).  The main overhead is the extra footprint for the cached rb_node
pointer, which should not matter for procfs.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170719014603.19029-14-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/proc/generic.c  |   26 ++++++++++++++------------
 fs/proc/internal.h |    2 +-
 fs/proc/proc_net.c |    2 +-
 fs/proc/root.c     |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/proc/generic.c~procfs-use-faster-rb_first_cached fs/proc/generic.c
--- a/fs/proc/generic.c~procfs-use-faster-rb_first_cached
+++ a/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ static int proc_match(unsigned int len,
 
 static struct proc_dir_entry *pde_subdir_first(struct proc_dir_entry *dir)
 {
-	return rb_entry_safe(rb_first(&dir->subdir), struct proc_dir_entry,
-			     subdir_node);
+	return rb_entry_safe(rb_first_cached(&dir->subdir),
+			     struct proc_dir_entry, subdir_node);
 }
 
 static struct proc_dir_entry *pde_subdir_next(struct proc_dir_entry *dir)
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static struct proc_dir_entry *pde_subdir
 					      const char *name,
 					      unsigned int len)
 {
-	struct rb_node *node = dir->subdir.rb_node;
+	struct rb_node *node = dir->subdir.rb_root.rb_node;
 
 	while (node) {
 		struct proc_dir_entry *de = rb_entry(node,
@@ -75,8 +75,9 @@ static struct proc_dir_entry *pde_subdir
 static bool pde_subdir_insert(struct proc_dir_entry *dir,
 			      struct proc_dir_entry *de)
 {
-	struct rb_root *root = &dir->subdir;
-	struct rb_node **new = &root->rb_node, *parent = NULL;
+	struct rb_root_cached *root = &dir->subdir;
+	struct rb_node **new = &root->rb_root.rb_node, *parent = NULL;
+	bool leftmost = true;
 
 	/* Figure out where to put new node */
 	while (*new) {
@@ -88,15 +89,16 @@ static bool pde_subdir_insert(struct pro
 		parent = *new;
 		if (result < 0)
 			new = &(*new)->rb_left;
-		else if (result > 0)
+		else if (result > 0) {
 			new = &(*new)->rb_right;
-		else
+			leftmost = false;
+		} else
 			return false;
 	}
 
 	/* Add new node and rebalance tree. */
 	rb_link_node(&de->subdir_node, parent, new);
-	rb_insert_color(&de->subdir_node, root);
+	rb_insert_color_cached(&de->subdir_node, root, leftmost);
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -369,7 +371,7 @@ static struct proc_dir_entry *__proc_cre
 	ent->namelen = qstr.len;
 	ent->mode = mode;
 	ent->nlink = nlink;
-	ent->subdir = RB_ROOT;
+	ent->subdir = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
 	atomic_set(&ent->count, 1);
 	spin_lock_init(&ent->pde_unload_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ent->pde_openers);
@@ -553,7 +555,7 @@ void remove_proc_entry(const char *name,
 
 	de = pde_subdir_find(parent, fn, len);
 	if (de)
-		rb_erase(&de->subdir_node, &parent->subdir);
+		rb_erase_cached(&de->subdir_node, &parent->subdir);
 	write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
 	if (!de) {
 		WARN(1, "name '%s'\n", name);
@@ -590,13 +592,13 @@ int remove_proc_subtree(const char *name
 		write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
-	rb_erase(&root->subdir_node, &parent->subdir);
+	rb_erase_cached(&root->subdir_node, &parent->subdir);
 
 	de = root;
 	while (1) {
 		next = pde_subdir_first(de);
 		if (next) {
-			rb_erase(&next->subdir_node, &de->subdir);
+			rb_erase_cached(&next->subdir_node, &de->subdir);
 			de = next;
 			continue;
 		}
diff -puN fs/proc/internal.h~procfs-use-faster-rb_first_cached fs/proc/internal.h
--- a/fs/proc/internal.h~procfs-use-faster-rb_first_cached
+++ a/fs/proc/internal.h
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry {
 	const struct inode_operations *proc_iops;
 	const struct file_operations *proc_fops;
 	struct proc_dir_entry *parent;
-	struct rb_root subdir;
+	struct rb_root_cached subdir;
 	struct rb_node subdir_node;
 	void *data;
 	atomic_t count;		/* use count */
diff -puN fs/proc/proc_net.c~procfs-use-faster-rb_first_cached fs/proc/proc_net.c
--- a/fs/proc/proc_net.c~procfs-use-faster-rb_first_cached
+++ a/fs/proc/proc_net.c
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static __net_init int proc_net_ns_init(s
 	if (!netd)
 		goto out;
 
-	netd->subdir = RB_ROOT;
+	netd->subdir = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
 	netd->data = net;
 	netd->nlink = 2;
 	netd->namelen = 3;
diff -puN fs/proc/root.c~procfs-use-faster-rb_first_cached fs/proc/root.c
--- a/fs/proc/root.c~procfs-use-faster-rb_first_cached
+++ a/fs/proc/root.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry proc_root = {
 	.proc_iops	= &proc_root_inode_operations, 
 	.proc_fops	= &proc_root_operations,
 	.parent		= &proc_root,
-	.subdir		= RB_ROOT,
+	.subdir		= RB_ROOT_CACHED,
 	.name		= "/proc",
 };
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from dave@stgolabs.net are



                 reply	other threads:[~2017-09-11 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170911194204.7GG1BMN-D%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dbueso@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.