From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, raven@themaw.net, tkusumi@tuxera.com
Subject: [merged] autofs-use-unsigned-int-long-instead-of-uint-ulong-for-ioctl-args.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:43:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170911194325.v4G--gQ8W%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: autofs: use unsigned int/long instead of uint/ulong for ioctl args
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
autofs-use-unsigned-int-long-instead-of-uint-ulong-for-ioctl-args.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Tomohiro Kusumi <tkusumi@tuxera.com>
Subject: autofs: use unsigned int/long instead of uint/ulong for ioctl args
The standard types unsigned int and unsigned long should be used for
.compat_ioctl. autofs is the only fs using uing/ulong for this, and these
are even the only uint/ulong in the entire autofs code.
Drop unneeded long cast in return value of autofs_dev_ioctl_compat().
It's already long.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/150285069709.4670.3884827966280147529.stgit@pluto.themaw.net
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <tkusumi@tuxera.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c~autofs-use-unsigned-int-long-instead-of-uint-ulong-for-ioctl-args fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
--- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c~autofs-use-unsigned-int-long-instead-of-uint-ulong-for-ioctl-args
+++ a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int check_dev_ioctl_version(int c
* at the end of the struct.
*/
static struct autofs_dev_ioctl *
- copy_dev_ioctl(struct autofs_dev_ioctl __user *in)
+copy_dev_ioctl(struct autofs_dev_ioctl __user *in)
{
struct autofs_dev_ioctl tmp, *res;
@@ -705,7 +705,8 @@ out:
return err;
}
-static long autofs_dev_ioctl(struct file *file, uint command, ulong u)
+static long autofs_dev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int command,
+ unsigned long u)
{
int err;
@@ -714,9 +715,10 @@ static long autofs_dev_ioctl(struct file
}
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
-static long autofs_dev_ioctl_compat(struct file *file, uint command, ulong u)
+static long autofs_dev_ioctl_compat(struct file *file, unsigned int command,
+ unsigned long u)
{
- return (long) autofs_dev_ioctl(file, command, (ulong) compat_ptr(u));
+ return autofs_dev_ioctl(file, command, (unsigned long) compat_ptr(u));
}
#else
#define autofs_dev_ioctl_compat NULL
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from tkusumi@tuxera.com are
reply other threads:[~2017-09-11 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170911194325.v4G--gQ8W%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=tkusumi@tuxera.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.