From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36765) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsQFk-0000fK-4Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 05:16:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsQFe-00075v-0B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 05:16:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsQFd-00074i-RE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 05:16:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:15:56 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20170914111556.457796e0.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170913115029.47626-1-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20170913115029.47626-1-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] add CCW indirect data access support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Halil Pasic Cc: Dong Jia Shi , Pierre Morel , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:50:25 +0200 Halil Pasic wrote: > Abstract > -------- > > The objective of this series is introducing CCW IDA (indirect data > access) support to our virtual channel subsystem implementation. Briefly > CCW IDA can be thought of as a kind of a scatter gather support for a > single CCW. If certain flags are set, the cda is to be interpreted as an > address to a list which in turn holds further addresses designating the > actual data. Thus the scheme which we are currently using for accessing > CCW payload does not work in general case. Currently there is no > immediate need for proper IDA handling (no use case), but since it IDA is > a non-optional part of the architecture, the only way towards AR > compliance is actually implementing IDA. > > Testing > ------- > > On request the things meant for testing from v1 were factored out > into a separate series (requested by Connie). Please look for > the series 'tests for CCW IDA' (comming soon) or use the stuff > form v1. Generally, looks good; currently testing it. Would not mind some R-bs :)