From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:14:53 +0200 Subject: [LTP] LTP release In-Reply-To: <1118211565.15787694.1505398656441.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <20170907105921.GB775@rei.lan> <1118211565.15787694.1505398656441.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20170914151453.GC11303@rei> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > > It's about a time we should start preparing for another release. > > > > As usuall let's start with pointing out patches that should be part of > > it, then we will proceed with freezing the repo and round of pre-release > > testing, etc. > > I started running tests (syscalls, misc, commands, etc.) across RHELs: > 6.2-6.10(i386,x86_64,ppc64,s390x) and 7.0-7.4(x86_64, ppc64, ppc64le, s390x). > > Other than couple small issues that have been fixed, and known kernel bugs, > it's looking good. It's looking good on my side as well. I still want to fix the utimensat_tests.sh before the release that fails on stable kernels that backported the fix. Apart from that I would consider tmpfs for EROFS patch, since that one may be a good speed up. And possibly the synchronization library for CVE tests, if Richard manages to send updated patchset. And that should ideally be all, or have I missed something? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz