From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duOzv-0005eC-69 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:20:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duOzq-0004sX-JT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:19:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duOzq-0004s0-Bh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:19:54 -0400 From: Eduardo Habkost Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:18:49 -0300 Message-Id: <20170919201850.14772-12-ehabkost@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170919201850.14772-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> References: <20170919201850.14772-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 11/12] hw/acpi-build: Fix SRAT memory building in case of node 0 without RAM List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum , Igor Mammedov Currently, Using the fisrt node without memory on the machine makes QEMU unhappy. With this example command line: ... \ -m 1024M,slots=4,maxmem=32G \ -numa node,nodeid=0 \ -numa node,mem=1024M,nodeid=1 \ -numa node,nodeid=2 \ -numa node,nodeid=3 \ Guest reports "No NUMA configuration found" and the NUMA topology is wrong. This is because when QEMU builds ACPI SRAT, it regards node 0 as the default node to deal with the memory hole(640K-1M). this means the node0 must have some memory(>1M), but, actually it can have no memory. Fix this problem by cut out the 640K hole in the same way the PCI 4G hole does. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang Message-Id: <1504231805-30957-2-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c index 4d19d91e1b..d72bcdcd49 100644 --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c @@ -2288,6 +2288,9 @@ build_tpm2(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker) (void *)tpm2_ptr, "TPM2", sizeof(*tpm2_ptr), 4, NULL, NULL); } +#define HOLE_640K_START (640 * 1024) +#define HOLE_640K_END (1024 * 1024) + static void build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, MachineState *machine) { @@ -2343,17 +2346,30 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, MachineState *machine) next_base = 0; numa_start = table_data->len; - numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem); - build_srat_memory(numamem, 0, 640 * 1024, 0, MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED); - next_base = 1024 * 1024; for (i = 1; i < pcms->numa_nodes + 1; ++i) { mem_base = next_base; mem_len = pcms->node_mem[i - 1]; - if (i == 1) { - mem_len -= 1024 * 1024; - } next_base = mem_base + mem_len; + /* Cut out the 640K hole */ + if (mem_base <= HOLE_640K_START && + next_base > HOLE_640K_START) { + mem_len -= next_base - HOLE_640K_START; + if (mem_len > 0) { + numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem); + build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, mem_len, i - 1, + MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED); + } + + /* Check for the rare case: 640K < RAM < 1M */ + if (next_base <= HOLE_640K_END) { + next_base = HOLE_640K_END; + continue; + } + mem_base = HOLE_640K_END; + mem_len = next_base - HOLE_640K_END; + } + /* Cut out the ACPI_PCI hole */ if (mem_base <= pcms->below_4g_mem_size && next_base > pcms->below_4g_mem_size) { -- 2.13.5