From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752324AbdIVMbO (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 22 Sep 2017 08:31:14 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:36009 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752125AbdIVMbN (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 22 Sep 2017 08:31:13 -0400
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:31:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, mingo@redhat.com,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] x86: kvm guest side support for KVM_HC_RT_PRIO
 hypercall
Message-ID: <20170922123107.fjh2yfwnej73trim@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20170921113835.031375194@redhat.com>
 <20170921114039.466130276@redhat.com>
 <20170921133653.GO26248@char.us.oracle.com>
 <20170921140628.zliqlz7mrlqs5pzz@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20170922011039.GB20133@amt.cnet>
 <20170922100004.ydmaxvgpc2zx7j25@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20170922121640.GA29589@amt.cnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170922121640.GA29589@amt.cnet>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:16:40AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:00:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:10:41PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > When executing guest vcpu-0 with FIFO:1 priority, which is necessary
> > > to
> > > deal with the following situation:
> > > 
> > > VCPU-0 (housekeeping VCPU)              VCPU-1 (realtime VCPU)
> > > 
> > > raw_spin_lock(A)
> > > interrupted, schedule task T-1          raw_spin_lock(A) (spin)
> > > 
> > > raw_spin_unlock(A)
> > > 
> > > Certain operations must interrupt guest vcpu-0 (see trace below).
> > 
> > Those traces don't make any sense. All they include is kvm_exit and you
> > can't tell anything from that.
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> OK lets describe whats happening:
> 
> With QEMU emulator thread and vcpu-0 sharing a physical CPU
> (which is a request from several NFV customers, to improve
> guest packing), the following occurs when the guest generates 
> the following pattern:
> 
> 		1. submit IO.
> 		2. busy spin.

User-space spinning is a bad idea in general and terminally broken in
a RT setup. Sounds like you need to go fix qemu to not suck.