From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936929AbdIZMlE (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2017 08:41:04 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:59117 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934771AbdIZMlD (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2017 08:41:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:40:58 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Anna-Maria Gleixner Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , Christoph Hellwig , keescook@chromium.org, John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/25] hrtimer: Implementation of softirq hrtimer handling Message-ID: <20170926124058.vrzrcn776qqi2dqw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20170831105725.809317030@linutronix.de> <20170831105826.921969670@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170831105826.921969670@linutronix.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:23:42PM -0000, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote: > @@ -184,6 +188,7 @@ struct hrtimer_cpu_base { > unsigned int clock_was_set_seq; > bool migration_enabled; > bool nohz_active; > + bool softirq_activated; > unsigned int hres_active : 1, > in_hrtirq : 1, > hang_detected : 1; Why do we have bools and a bitfield? Should that not all be part of the bitfield?