All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
	Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
	Tom Nguyen <tom81094@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/14] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance(part 1)
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 18:32:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170930103211.GA29093@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170930102720.30219-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 06:27:13PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> In Red Hat internal storage test wrt. blk-mq scheduler, we
> found that I/O performance is much bad with mq-deadline, especially
> about sequential I/O on some multi-queue SCSI devcies(lpfc, qla2xxx,
> SRP...)
> 
> Turns out one big issue causes the performance regression: requests
> are still dequeued from sw queue/scheduler queue even when ldd's
> queue is busy, so I/O merge becomes quite difficult to make, then
> sequential IO degrades a lot.
> 
> This issue becomes one of mains reasons for reverting default SCSI_MQ
> in V4.13.
> 
> The 1st patch takes direct issue in blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(),
> then we can improve dm-mpath's performance in part 2, which will
> be posted out soon.
> 
> The 2nd six patches improve this situation, and brings back
> some performance loss.
> 
> With this change, SCSI-MQ sequential I/O performance is
> improved much, Paolo reported that mq-deadline performance
> improved much[2] in his dbench test wrt V2. Also performanc
> improvement on lpfc/qla2xx was observed with V1.[1]
> 
> Please consider it for V4.15.
> 
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=150151989915776&w=2
> [2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=150217980602843&w=2
> 
> V5:
> 	- address some comments from Omar
> 	- add Tested-by & Reveiewed-by tag
> 	- use direct issue for blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(), and
> 	start to consider to improve sequential I/O for dm-mpath
> 	- only include part 1(the original patch 1 ~ 6), as suggested
> 	by Omar
> 
> V4:
> 	- add Reviewed-by tag
> 	- some trival change: typo fix in commit log or comment,
> 	variable name, no actual functional change
> 
> V3:
> 	- totally round robin for picking req from ctx, as suggested
> 	by Bart
> 	- remove one local variable in __sbitmap_for_each_set()
> 	- drop patches of single dispatch list, which can improve
> 	performance on mq-deadline, but cause a bit degrade on
> 	none because all hctxs need to be checked after ->dispatch
> 	is flushed. Will post it again once it is mature.
> 	- rebase on v4.13-rc6 with block for-next
> 
> V2:
> 	- dequeue request from sw queues in round roubin's style
> 	as suggested by Bart, and introduces one helper in sbitmap
> 	for this purpose
> 	- improve bio merge via hash table from sw queue
> 	- add comments about using DISPATCH_BUSY state in lockless way,
> 	simplifying handling on busy state,
> 	- hold ctx->lock when clearing ctx busy bit as suggested
> 	by Bart
> 
> 
> Ming Lei (7):
>   blk-mq: issue rq directly in blk_mq_request_bypass_insert()
>   blk-mq-sched: fix scheduler bad performance
>   sbitmap: introduce __sbitmap_for_each_set()
>   blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_dequeue_from_ctx()
>   blk-mq-sched: move actual dispatching into one helper
>   blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue
>   blk-mq-sched: don't dequeue request until all in ->dispatch are
>     flushed
> 
>  block/blk-core.c        |   3 +-
>  block/blk-mq-debugfs.c  |   1 +
>  block/blk-mq-sched.c    | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  block/blk-mq.c          | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  block/blk-mq.h          |   4 +-
>  drivers/md/dm-rq.c      |   2 +-
>  include/linux/blk-mq.h  |   3 ++
>  include/linux/sbitmap.h |  64 +++++++++++++++++++--------
>  8 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

Oops, the title should have been:

[PATCH V5 0/7] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance(part 1)

Sorry for that.

-- 
Ming

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-30 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-30 10:27 [PATCH V5 00/14] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance(part 1) Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 1/7] blk-mq: issue rq directly in blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() Ming Lei
2017-10-03  8:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 13:39     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 2/7] blk-mq-sched: fix scheduler bad performance Ming Lei
2017-10-02 14:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 3/7] sbitmap: introduce __sbitmap_for_each_set() Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 4/7] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_dequeue_from_ctx() Ming Lei
2017-10-03  9:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-09  4:36     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 5/7] blk-mq-sched: move actual dispatching into one helper Ming Lei
2017-10-02 14:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-09  9:07     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 6/7] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue Ming Lei
2017-10-03  9:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-09 10:15     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 7/7] blk-mq-sched: don't dequeue request until all in ->dispatch are flushed Ming Lei
2017-10-03  9:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-09 10:40     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:32 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-10-09 12:09 ` [PATCH V5 00/14] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance(part 1) John Garry
2017-10-09 12:09   ` John Garry
2017-10-09 15:04   ` Ming Lei
2017-10-10  1:46     ` Ming Lei
2017-10-10 12:24       ` John Garry
2017-10-10 12:24         ` John Garry
2017-10-10 12:34         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-10 12:34           ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-10 12:37           ` Paolo Valente
2017-10-10 12:37             ` Paolo Valente
2017-10-10 13:45         ` Ming Lei
2017-10-10 15:10           ` John Garry
2017-10-10 15:10             ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170930103211.GA29093@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom81094@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.