All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Maintainer's Summit Agenda Planning
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 11:51:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171006165136.65qevrn563q3ntw4@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171006103259.78ab2508@lwn.net>

On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 10:32:59AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 11:26:21 -0500
> Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > I think it would be a good idea to have a Maintainer's Guide which tries
> > to document a lot of this knowledge.  It would help new maintainers
> > learn the ropes, and would also help drive consensus for maintainer's
> > best practices.  It could document the typical processes of a
> > maintainer, and policy guidelines like some of the above topics.
> 
> Strangely enough, this is a conversation that has been popping up in other
> contexts too.  We may see an initial attempt before too long.

Ah, nice.

> The tricky part, of course, is finding a way to document the consensus on
> best practices without trying to "drive" it too hard.

We somehow manage to get consensus on millions of lines of code, you'd
think we could figure out how to agree on a small process document ;-)

But seriously, I think even parts which are disagreed upon, or which are
up to the maintainer's judgement, can be documented as such.

I wonder if a maintainers mailing list would help for such discussions,
if we don't already have one.

> My own thought is that a good starting place might be a "how to avoid
> getting your pull request flamed" document, since there is some semblance
> of a consensus there and it's a place where people often make mistakes.

Agreed!

-- 
Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-06 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-05 19:20 [Ksummit-discuss] Maintainer's Summit Agenda Planning Theodore Ts'o
2017-10-05 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-05 21:55 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-06 14:59 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-10-06 15:27 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-06 16:26   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-06 16:32     ` Jonathan Corbet
2017-10-06 16:51       ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-10-06 16:56       ` James Bottomley
2017-10-06 17:16         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-06 20:11       ` Linus Walleij
2017-10-09  8:13   ` Mark Brown
2017-10-09 15:54   ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-09 16:37     ` James Bottomley
2017-10-09 16:47       ` Joe Perches
2017-10-09 16:49       ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-09 16:56         ` James Bottomley
2017-10-09 17:04           ` Joe Perches
2017-10-11 18:51           ` Jani Nikula
2017-10-12 10:03             ` Daniel Vetter
2017-10-16 14:12             ` James Bottomley
2017-10-16 14:25               ` Jani Nikula
2017-10-16 16:07                 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-17  8:34                   ` Jani Nikula
2017-10-18  1:27                     ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 10:41                       ` Jani Nikula
2017-10-16 18:52               ` Mark Brown
2017-10-10  8:53       ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-24 23:03   ` Kees Cook
2017-10-24 23:41     ` Joe Perches
2017-10-25  0:54       ` Kees Cook
2017-10-25  4:21         ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-25  4:29           ` Joe Perches
2017-10-25  4:36             ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-25  6:05         ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-10-25  6:55           ` Kees Cook
2017-10-25  7:34             ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-10-25  6:45         ` Frank Rowand
2017-10-25  7:56         ` Mark Brown
2017-10-25  9:39         ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-10-31 19:19         ` Rob Herring
2017-10-31 19:28           ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171006165136.65qevrn563q3ntw4@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.