From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755184AbdJJHLt (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 10 Oct 2017 03:11:49 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:38602 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752207AbdJJHLr (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 10 Oct 2017 03:11:47 -0400
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:11:55 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tom Gall <tom.gall@linaro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>, patches@kernelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
        linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/104] 4.9.54-stable review
Message-ID: <20171010071155.GD15404@kroah.com>
References: <20171006083840.743659740@linuxfoundation.org>
 <86143165-0B1E-415D-B872-41B65EC0C7FA@linaro.org>
 <20171008072324.GC1428@kroah.com>
 <CAOfXc9H1isejr1AFXGQ085v8ns=XQGPXmoYhy-dWKfGiMZDWyQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOfXc9H1isejr1AFXGQ085v8ns=XQGPXmoYhy-dWKfGiMZDWyQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 03:37:43PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> kernel: 4.9.54-rc1
> >> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> >> git branch: linux-4.9.y
> >> git commit: 1852eae92c460813692808234da35d142a405ab7
> >> git describe: v4.9.53
> >> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.53
> 
> >>
> >> No regressions (compared to build v4.9.52-65-gaceea42c68d9)
> >
> > How did your arm64 test build?  There was a build regression in the -rc1
> > release, are you sure you actually ran the correct image?
> 
> So the header in that report was wrong. That's a c/n/p error on my
> part. I was in a rush to get you data before I was going to be gone
> for the day on Sat and wanting to get what we had into your hands
> before the Sunday deadline.
> 
> The test results was for the RC as of commit
> 0e59436504287cddb9663857ae69c100b55f5e85
> 
> If you want to see the 'ugly' raw data it's all here :
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.53-105-g0e5943650428/

I still don't understand.  That _build_ should have failed, how did it
succeed enough to actually run the tests at all?

thanks,

greg k-h