From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Antony Antony <antony@phenome.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:18:37 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: sun50i-h5.dtsi : add h5 & a64
 compatible to mmc[0-2]
In-Reply-To: <CAD6G_RQ=XQxN+rU1a0Cf5nnAreqe-pg0jPwY4uMVNY6jvaTo_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170921152217.4011-1-antony@phenome.org>
 <20171010133546.98061-1-antony@phenome.org>
 <CALeDE9O4fJ2qSb6khhC0Qh5QZ+94N6Y9hb4r8+pGMHhdFN9OQA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD6G_RQ=XQxN+rU1a0Cf5nnAreqe-pg0jPwY4uMVNY6jvaTo_A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20171010171837.72b65vrp6evn6c3h@AntonyAntony.local>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:21:57PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Shouldn't we just be syncing changes to the DT from the kernel?
>

I guess syncing could possibly solve the problem! Kernel DTSI got the 
compiltables I need from the begining.

The diff looks big to me. I am not sure yet, I understand all changes.  
Anyone who would like to sync the two files? Or willing to help me?
 
diff ~/u-boot/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-h5.dtsi 
~/linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
 
> And add last merge commit details on commit message.

A good point. I am wondering what is the practice for this u-boot commit 
message. I do not see commit IDs mentioned. A few commits seems to mention 
kernel version in the commit message.

-antony