From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1756327AbdJQNGc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:06:32 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35936 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753183AbdJQNGb (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:06:31 -0400
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:06:29 +0200
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>
To: Ruslan Bilovol <rbilovol@cisco.com>
Cc: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@gmail.com>,
        Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
        zhouchengming <zhouchengming1@huawei.com>,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        jpoimboe@redhat.com, jikos@kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com,
        Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reduce the time of finding symbols for module
Message-ID: <20171017130629.kqoqxbozfsyapb6i@suse.de>
References: <1490666535-19192-1-git-send-email-zhouchengming1@huawei.com>
 <alpine.LSU.2.20.1703281055550.30237@pobox.suse.cz>
 <58DA41EE.90607@huawei.com>
 <alpine.LSU.2.20.1703281308060.30237@pobox.suse.cz>
 <20170329000333.zmafvp4uk34m3em6@jeyu>
 <65c261d0-1e83-8d29-899d-ec22e54a24a7@huawei.com>
 <CAB=otbRWuX7pwk1vrjTFYfQctOLpGPxC=jvSf_xfpWQgxWkZKg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171013131841.en3yuwtl3wedei5t@suse.de>
 <da67dde1-19ba-f1d0-db2b-6e874cf591b0@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <da67dde1-19ba-f1d0-db2b-6e874cf591b0@cisco.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170421 (1.8.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:44:21PM +0300, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> On 10/13/2017 04:18 PM, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > 
> > I also have the coresponding kernel patch(es) here. IIRC I already sent
> > tham to LKML. I'll re-send them once there are more gcc's with -fpatchable-function-entry
> > support out there.
> 
> Do you mean "[PATCH v3 0/2] arm64 live patching" [1] series?

Yes. With current kernel and updated compiler patching, you'll have to
adjust the naming, but that should basically be it.

> I'm going to play with them and see how it works.
> 
> Another question: have you tested livepatching on Big Endian systems?

No. If there are any endian issues, let me know!

	Torsten