From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30C9FBC3 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-f179.google.com (mail-qt0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EAD347E for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 31so3387901qtz.9 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 06:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:21:53 -0400 From: Tom Rini To: Boris Brezillon Message-ID: <20171017132153.GH12015@bill-the-cat> References: <20171017114823.58476908@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171017114823.58476908@bbrezillon> Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Kumar Gala , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Rob Herring , devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org, Pantelis Antoniou , Andy Gross , Lucas Stach , David Gibson Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Devicetree Workshop at Kernel Summit Prague (26 Oct 2017) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:48:23AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hello Grant, > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 21:39:51 +0100 > Grant Likely wrote: > > > Kernel Summit is now just over 2 weeks away and it is time to pull > > together the schedule for the Devicetree workshop. Originally I > > planned on just an afternoon, but I've got the room for the whole day, > > so I've got a lot of flexibility on the schedule. Unscheduled time can > > be used for hacking. > > > > Date: 26 Oct 2017 > > Time: 9:00am-5:30pm (Lunch from 12:30-2:30) > > Location: Athens room - Hilton Prague > > > > If you plan to attend, make sure you update your OSSunmitE/ELCE > > registration to include the DT Workshop (log in to access and modify > > your registration): > > > > https://www.regonline.com/register/login.aspx?eventID=1883377&MethodId=0&EventsessionId=&Email_Address=&membershipID= > > > > Here is my current list of topics in no particular order, including > > the topic moderator: > > > > Runtime memory consumption (Rob Herring) > > Overlay maintenance plan (TBC) > > Stable ABI for devicetree (TBC) > > DT YAML encoding (Pantelis Antoniou) > > DT Schema format - option 1 (Pantelis Antoniou) > > DT Schema format - option 2 (Grant Likely) > > Sharing Generic bindings (TBC) > > devicetree.org update (Grant) > > > > Reply to this email if you want to propose another topic. > > Not sure yet if I'll attend the DT workshop or not, but I thought I > could ask my question here because it might be of interest to someone > else who is attending. > > What happens when the DT bindings is not documented in Linux but in an > another project because this project was the first to use it. > > I had the case here http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/810275/, and I'm > not sure what's the policy when this happens. Should we add a file > under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/... that points to the external > doc file, should we duplicate the DT bindings doc in Linux, or should > we just leave the bindings undocumented in the kernel tree? I really hope (and have tried pushing via some other channels) that given Android's embrace of devicetree for Android 8 they will have people present as there's going to be issues like the above cropping up now. -- Tom From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Devicetree Workshop at Kernel Summit Prague (26 Oct 2017) Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:21:53 -0400 Message-ID: <20171017132153.GH12015@bill-the-cat> References: <20171017114823.58476908@bbrezillon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171017114823.58476908@bbrezillon> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Grant Likely , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , devicetree-spec-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "ksummit-discuss-cunTk1MwBs98uUxBSJOaYoYkZiVZrdSR2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org" , David Gibson , Julia Lawall , Pantelis Antoniou , Lucas Stach , Kumar Gala , Andy Gross , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:48:23AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hello Grant, > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 21:39:51 +0100 > Grant Likely wrote: > > > Kernel Summit is now just over 2 weeks away and it is time to pull > > together the schedule for the Devicetree workshop. Originally I > > planned on just an afternoon, but I've got the room for the whole day, > > so I've got a lot of flexibility on the schedule. Unscheduled time can > > be used for hacking. > > > > Date: 26 Oct 2017 > > Time: 9:00am-5:30pm (Lunch from 12:30-2:30) > > Location: Athens room - Hilton Prague > > > > If you plan to attend, make sure you update your OSSunmitE/ELCE > > registration to include the DT Workshop (log in to access and modify > > your registration): > > > > https://www.regonline.com/register/login.aspx?eventID=1883377&MethodId=0&EventsessionId=&Email_Address=&membershipID= > > > > Here is my current list of topics in no particular order, including > > the topic moderator: > > > > Runtime memory consumption (Rob Herring) > > Overlay maintenance plan (TBC) > > Stable ABI for devicetree (TBC) > > DT YAML encoding (Pantelis Antoniou) > > DT Schema format - option 1 (Pantelis Antoniou) > > DT Schema format - option 2 (Grant Likely) > > Sharing Generic bindings (TBC) > > devicetree.org update (Grant) > > > > Reply to this email if you want to propose another topic. > > Not sure yet if I'll attend the DT workshop or not, but I thought I > could ask my question here because it might be of interest to someone > else who is attending. > > What happens when the DT bindings is not documented in Linux but in an > another project because this project was the first to use it. > > I had the case here http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/810275/, and I'm > not sure what's the policy when this happens. Should we add a file > under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/... that points to the external > doc file, should we duplicate the DT bindings doc in Linux, or should > we just leave the bindings undocumented in the kernel tree? I really hope (and have tried pushing via some other channels) that given Android's embrace of devicetree for Android 8 they will have people present as there's going to be issues like the above cropping up now. -- Tom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html