From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C67AACC for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk (heliosphere.sirena.org.uk [172.104.155.198]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95BA74EB for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:09:58 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Chen-Yu Tsai Message-ID: <20171018110958.mh76pngzluazmc7y@sirena.co.uk> References: <20171017114823.58476908@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bzphq2jqparykyo3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Rob Herring , Kumar Gala , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org, Pantelis Antoniou , Andy Gross , Lucas Stach , Tom Rini , David Gibson Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Devicetree Workshop at Kernel Summit Prague (26 Oct 2017) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --bzphq2jqparykyo3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 06:35:24PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > I'd like to add something on the topic of non-Linux projects. In this > case it's diverging DT bindings from U-boot: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/823158/ > U-boot already has a set of devicetree binding additions: > https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/tree/master/doc/device-tree-bindings > The patch in question wants to ab(use) the regulator-name property for > driver instance binding. In my opinion this is not going to fly, as > boards are free to define the names. This either sees no use other than > as a dirty workaround for dts files that aren't following the PMIC > regulator bindings (regulator node names should follow well defined, > identifying names), or results in divergence of the DT files. One meta issue I'm seeing here is that the u-boot people appear to have their own divergent copy of some of the binding documents. --bzphq2jqparykyo3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlnnNoYACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Aqqgf/Tt4qP1izi+d7AxDn/VDK+wgO0/ocjIkcXydHOqk0RhEn8wavrIJhHbbt 4f4xxJbZ17LOCFEAWpF4mK0zq4TOkWqx3WUgmV82rXAa8ItYReSH1u3/e61gvrOI 5dzN3UQkP6f6D16nams1ObLkzQ/UzfsYyVIXoOkV3Rq6kXY5CYM5QD1ugPJWIw7g Y3PB9nBdbTf8tDKBONCkL4G2JPC0ZWP7vL5D0rKfXshW3B+/4m2njuHi1LRwcuz2 i19ma/YxjEXmhKSGL1YdU9kQtoKJgGI1XLX81YjYWYUoFnCTh9cv4kYFky01Smp2 mkqC+lRLx+0VIcTNfzjwiP5Nnxwnrg== =fc0l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bzphq2jqparykyo3-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Devicetree Workshop at Kernel Summit Prague (26 Oct 2017) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:09:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20171018110958.mh76pngzluazmc7y@sirena.co.uk> References: <20171017114823.58476908@bbrezillon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bzphq2jqparykyo3" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Grant Likely , Kumar Gala , "ksummit-discuss-cunTk1MwBs98uUxBSJOaYoYkZiVZrdSR2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org" , Rob Herring , devicetree-spec-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Pantelis Antoniou , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Andy Gross , David Gibson , Tom Rini , Lucas Stach List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --bzphq2jqparykyo3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 06:35:24PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > I'd like to add something on the topic of non-Linux projects. In this > case it's diverging DT bindings from U-boot: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/823158/ > U-boot already has a set of devicetree binding additions: > https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/tree/master/doc/device-tree-bindings > The patch in question wants to ab(use) the regulator-name property for > driver instance binding. In my opinion this is not going to fly, as > boards are free to define the names. This either sees no use other than > as a dirty workaround for dts files that aren't following the PMIC > regulator bindings (regulator node names should follow well defined, > identifying names), or results in divergence of the DT files. One meta issue I'm seeing here is that the u-boot people appear to have their own divergent copy of some of the binding documents. --bzphq2jqparykyo3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlnnNoYACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Aqqgf/Tt4qP1izi+d7AxDn/VDK+wgO0/ocjIkcXydHOqk0RhEn8wavrIJhHbbt 4f4xxJbZ17LOCFEAWpF4mK0zq4TOkWqx3WUgmV82rXAa8ItYReSH1u3/e61gvrOI 5dzN3UQkP6f6D16nams1ObLkzQ/UzfsYyVIXoOkV3Rq6kXY5CYM5QD1ugPJWIw7g Y3PB9nBdbTf8tDKBONCkL4G2JPC0ZWP7vL5D0rKfXshW3B+/4m2njuHi1LRwcuz2 i19ma/YxjEXmhKSGL1YdU9kQtoKJgGI1XLX81YjYWYUoFnCTh9cv4kYFky01Smp2 mkqC+lRLx+0VIcTNfzjwiP5Nnxwnrg== =fc0l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bzphq2jqparykyo3-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html