From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751129AbdJRTJc (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:09:32 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:46733 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750939AbdJRTJb (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:09:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:09:27 -0700 From: Darren Hart To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: Mario Limonciello , Andy Shevchenko , LKML , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , quasisec@google.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mjg59@google.com, hch@lst.de, Greg KH , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/17] platform/x86: dell-smbios-smm: test for WSMT Message-ID: <20171018190927.GA1097@fury> References: <20171017192258.fx2ejggjkyzkrzle@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20171017192258.fx2ejggjkyzkrzle@pali> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:22:58PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 17 October 2017 13:21:55 Mario Limonciello wrote: > > +/* When enabled this indicates that SMM won't work */ > > +static int test_wsmt_enabled(void) > > +{ > > + struct calling_interface_token *token; > > + > > + /* if token doesn't exist, SMM will work */ > > + token = dell_smbios_find_token(WSMT_EN_TOKEN); > > + if (!token) > > + return 0; > > + > > + /* if token exists, try to access over SMM */ > > + buffer->class = CLASS_TOKEN_READ; > > + buffer->select = SELECT_TOKEN_STD; > > + memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(struct calling_interface_buffer)); > > + buffer->input[0] = token->location; > > + dell_smbios_smm_call(buffer); > > + > > + /* if lookup failed, we know WSMT was enabled */ > > + if (buffer->output[0] != 0) > > + return 1; > > + > > + /* query token status if it didn't fail */ > > + return (buffer->output[1] == token->value); > > +} > > Maybe small suggestion... function returns only zero or one -- what is a > good candidate to have return value boolean and not basic int. Yes please. -- Darren Hart VMware Open Source Technology Center