From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 040A8900 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 00:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk (heliosphere.sirena.org.uk [172.104.155.198]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C31747E for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 00:04:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 01:04:33 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Tom Rini Message-ID: <20171019000433.y3qt3xaw4nnzvsga@sirena.co.uk> References: <20171017114823.58476908@bbrezillon> <20171018110958.mh76pngzluazmc7y@sirena.co.uk> <20171018175910.GP12015@bill-the-cat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lvrnqi4f33lcbutf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171018175910.GP12015@bill-the-cat> Cc: Rob Herring , Kumar Gala , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org, Pantelis Antoniou , Andy Gross , Lucas Stach , David Gibson Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Devicetree Workshop at Kernel Summit Prague (26 Oct 2017) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --lvrnqi4f33lcbutf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 01:59:10PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:09:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > One meta issue I'm seeing here is that the u-boot people appear to have > > their own divergent copy of some of the binding documents. > Putting on my U-Boot hat now, it's mostly unintentional and something in > general (yes, the initial topic here is not such an example) we try and > avoid, or use u-boot, as the prefix on as it's something that had been > previously rejected or deemed inappropriate to be in the upstream > version of the binding. Yeah, I didn't get the impression this was at all intentional. Unfortunately it's a shared property with divergent definitions rather than something u-boot specific that got added. > But perhaps it's time to try and force the issue again, given what Rob > and others have said in other parts of the thread. Yeah, if DT is going to be cross project we need to do better here. --lvrnqi4f33lcbutf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlnn7BAACgkQJNaLcl1U h9B0Awf9Fb9ds/if88WdUyhXMveJnzD10GiVuZ+Q9QIo/Po1PFYUPHi9l4Fu6fbc fc3HdxF1DDy7ID3ejBJkagio0xqHnI20snL7kTJKFz+wy1TT0irx0To6iJfc202I 3Ce/19fzEhes1uBpiMBhr9YJpi6ANBVGo6bOyYyva3ofgcmpUVizW0xPHCqwHcPA UXe7IhtVWcTh4dulOHksPJKMXnmdpyewcIIeQkon9zJxOc5eGENlWmeVWq/ah/aD JcEg1iin145YSBSCa3bIBlC+mXDC2vmJTD+SuylqZCSuOP2l8Iz5O+6plCwLlUGC 3i9SZ4FlkPg7YAYG0KiLKJnBinVQCw== =Z5fZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lvrnqi4f33lcbutf-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Devicetree Workshop at Kernel Summit Prague (26 Oct 2017) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 01:04:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20171019000433.y3qt3xaw4nnzvsga@sirena.co.uk> References: <20171017114823.58476908@bbrezillon> <20171018110958.mh76pngzluazmc7y@sirena.co.uk> <20171018175910.GP12015@bill-the-cat> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lvrnqi4f33lcbutf" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171018175910.GP12015@bill-the-cat> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Tom Rini Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Grant Likely , Kumar Gala , "ksummit-discuss-cunTk1MwBs98uUxBSJOaYoYkZiVZrdSR2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org" , Rob Herring , devicetree-spec-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Pantelis Antoniou , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Andy Gross , David Gibson , Lucas Stach List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --lvrnqi4f33lcbutf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 01:59:10PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:09:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > One meta issue I'm seeing here is that the u-boot people appear to have > > their own divergent copy of some of the binding documents. > Putting on my U-Boot hat now, it's mostly unintentional and something in > general (yes, the initial topic here is not such an example) we try and > avoid, or use u-boot, as the prefix on as it's something that had been > previously rejected or deemed inappropriate to be in the upstream > version of the binding. Yeah, I didn't get the impression this was at all intentional. Unfortunately it's a shared property with divergent definitions rather than something u-boot specific that got added. > But perhaps it's time to try and force the issue again, given what Rob > and others have said in other parts of the thread. Yeah, if DT is going to be cross project we need to do better here. --lvrnqi4f33lcbutf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlnn7BAACgkQJNaLcl1U h9B0Awf9Fb9ds/if88WdUyhXMveJnzD10GiVuZ+Q9QIo/Po1PFYUPHi9l4Fu6fbc fc3HdxF1DDy7ID3ejBJkagio0xqHnI20snL7kTJKFz+wy1TT0irx0To6iJfc202I 3Ce/19fzEhes1uBpiMBhr9YJpi6ANBVGo6bOyYyva3ofgcmpUVizW0xPHCqwHcPA UXe7IhtVWcTh4dulOHksPJKMXnmdpyewcIIeQkon9zJxOc5eGENlWmeVWq/ah/aD JcEg1iin145YSBSCa3bIBlC+mXDC2vmJTD+SuylqZCSuOP2l8Iz5O+6plCwLlUGC 3i9SZ4FlkPg7YAYG0KiLKJnBinVQCw== =Z5fZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lvrnqi4f33lcbutf-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html