From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751595AbdJSGgO (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 02:36:14 -0400 Received: from LGEAMRELO11.lge.com ([156.147.23.51]:56163 "EHLO lgeamrelo11.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751464AbdJSGgN (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 02:36:13 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.121 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.222.33 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:36:11 +0900 From: Byungchul Park To: Ingo Molnar Cc: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@lge.com, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: Introduce CROSSRELEASE_STACK_TRACE and make it not unwind as default Message-ID: <20171019063610.GD3310@X58A-UD3R> References: <1508318006-2090-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> <20171018100944.g2mc6yorhtm5piom@gmail.com> <20171019043240.GA3310@X58A-UD3R> <20171019055730.mlpoz333ekflacs2@gmail.com> <20171019061112.GB3310@X58A-UD3R> <20171019062212.n55vzg4khtds3mqk@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171019062212.n55vzg4khtds3mqk@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:22:12AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > There's no current crash regression that I know of - I'm just outlining the > conditions of getting all this re-enabled in the next merge window. > > Instead of sending two series, could you please send a series that includes both > these fixing + re-enabling patches, plus the false positive fixes? > > In particular I think the cross-release re-enabling should be done as the last > patch, so that any future bisections of new false positives won't be made more > difficult by re-introducing the old false positives near the end of the bisection. I agree. But I already sent v2 before you told me.. Do you want me to send patches fixing false positives in the thread fixing performance regression? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f70.google.com (mail-pg0-f70.google.com [74.125.83.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1A26B0033 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 02:36:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f70.google.com with SMTP id t10so5938872pgo.20 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:36:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lgeamrelo11.lge.com (LGEAMRELO11.lge.com. [156.147.23.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y69si8617980pfb.303.2017.10.18.23.36.12 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:36:11 +0900 From: Byungchul Park Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: Introduce CROSSRELEASE_STACK_TRACE and make it not unwind as default Message-ID: <20171019063610.GD3310@X58A-UD3R> References: <1508318006-2090-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> <20171018100944.g2mc6yorhtm5piom@gmail.com> <20171019043240.GA3310@X58A-UD3R> <20171019055730.mlpoz333ekflacs2@gmail.com> <20171019061112.GB3310@X58A-UD3R> <20171019062212.n55vzg4khtds3mqk@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171019062212.n55vzg4khtds3mqk@gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@lge.com, Linus Torvalds On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:22:12AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > There's no current crash regression that I know of - I'm just outlining the > conditions of getting all this re-enabled in the next merge window. > > Instead of sending two series, could you please send a series that includes both > these fixing + re-enabling patches, plus the false positive fixes? > > In particular I think the cross-release re-enabling should be done as the last > patch, so that any future bisections of new false positives won't be made more > difficult by re-introducing the old false positives near the end of the bisection. I agree. But I already sent v2 before you told me.. Do you want me to send patches fixing false positives in the thread fixing performance regression? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org