From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932295AbdJURzi convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Oct 2017 13:55:38 -0400 Received: from p3plsmtp22-02-2.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([68.178.252.56]:47781 "EHLO p3plwbeout22-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932212AbdJURzg (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Oct 2017 13:55:36 -0400 X-SID: 5xzEeEzkxmTD6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-IP: 24.196.106.86 User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 6.8.14 Message-Id: <20171021105503.669a95d04dbb6b53be537852cb8ecb8c.08db51c8a1.wbe@email22.secureserver.net> From: "Gabriel M. Elder" To: "Pali =?UTF-8?Q?Roh=C3=A1r?=" Cc: "Darren Hart" , "Matthew Garrett" , "Andy Shevchenko" , "Gabriele Mazzotta" , Mario.Limonciello@dell.com, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] dell-laptop: Fix keyboard led =?UTF-8?Q?max=5Fbrightness?= =?UTF-8?Q?=20property=20for=20Dell=20Latitude=20E=36=34=31=30?= Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 10:55:03 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfMuDc6YBLoh8AxrQIwUSZbg+tvjm53FeHktNhwd0Rgmv44jQxSsHgMiekye4t8V7OqPyBXWpaySs941W/FFvDOvhFP+898DhiRKY+mW0K5qGztSUkwBr C6pHNPdW3/JOzEBJbqX6WPMfbveXy57jQQu5xrulhCIbb7eZMFEKMfgKLCZXgLxWqX0+Fa5QOdnYRRR6wnxIEKQPxE3HyyrZNZoWYynOjUhyxa/Z8xf1xDKS Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dell-laptop: Fix keyboard led max_brightness property for Dell Latitude E6410 From: Pali Rohár Date: Thu, October 19, 2017 1:31 pm To: "Gabriel M. Elder" Cc: Darren Hart , Matthew Garrett , Andy Shevchenko , Gabriele Mazzotta , Mario.Limonciello@dell.com, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 19 October 2017 11:20:35 Gabriel M. Elder wrote: > I will be happy to test out whichever patch(es) present the most > appropriate approach, as a matter of consensus. > > Would that be the PATCH v2 > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10015149/) that I should be testing? Yes, v2. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@gmail.com -------- End Original Message -------- Based on my testing, the v2 patch seems to work fine. - Gabriel