From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:58592 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751083AbdJWG3v (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 02:29:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:29:49 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Benjamin Block , Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Thumshirn Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] bsg: split handling of SCSI CDBs vs transport requeues Message-ID: <20171023062949.GA16978@lst.de> References: <20171003104845.10417-1-hch@lst.de> <20171003104845.10417-10-hch@lst.de> <20171019155933.GE26185@bblock-ThinkPad-W530> <20171020162630.GA14277@lst.de> <20171020164727.GA26380@bblock-ThinkPad-W530> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:16:03AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Benjamin, > > >> Not sure it's worth it especially now that Martin has merged the patch. > > > > He did? I only saw a mail that he picked patches 2-5. So all the bsg > > changes are still open I think. > > Yes, I expected the bsg bits to go through Jens' tree. Ok, then I misremembered it, and we'll have to delay the remaining patches until the next merge window, as they depend on the previous ones.