On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:51:30PM +0200, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org wrote:

> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/slimbus/bus.txt |  57 ++
>  Documentation/slimbus/summary                     | 109 ++++

This is a 40k patch which is a bit offputting for review.  Splitting the
docs out would help this a bit.

> +static int slim_boot_child(struct device *dev, void *unused)
> +{
> +	struct slim_driver *sbdrv;
> +	struct slim_device *sbdev = to_slim_device(dev);
> +
> +	if (sbdev && sbdev->dev.driver) {
> +		sbdrv = to_slim_driver(sbdev->dev.driver);
> +		if (sbdrv->boot_device)
> +			sbdrv->boot_device(sbdev);
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}

We silently don't boot a device if it hasn't got a driver - is that the
right thing?  It feels like the silencing should be in the calling
function.

> +ret_assigned_laddr:
> +	mutex_unlock(&ctrl->m_ctrl);
> +	if (exists || ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	dev_info(&ctrl->dev, "setting slimbus l-addr:%x, ea:%x,%x,%x,%x\n",
> +		*laddr, e_addr->manf_id, e_addr->prod_code,
> +		e_addr->dev_index, e_addr->instance);

dev_dbg()?