From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: [Patch net 13/15] net_sched: add rtnl assertion to tcf_exts_destroy() Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:03:02 -0700 Message-ID: <20171023220304.2268-14-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> References: <20171023220304.2268-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jhs@mojatatu.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, Chris Mi , Cong Wang , Jiri Pirko To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:44547 "EHLO mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751388AbdJWWDr (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:03:47 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f67.google.com with SMTP id j3so12849054pga.1 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:03:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20171023220304.2268-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: After previous patches, it is now safe to claim that tcf_exts_destroy() is always called with RTNL lock. Cc: Jiri Pirko Cc: John Fastabend Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" Signed-off-by: Cong Wang --- net/sched/cls_api.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c index 0b2219adf520..c48482942995 100644 --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c @@ -879,6 +879,7 @@ void tcf_exts_destroy(struct tcf_exts *exts) #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT LIST_HEAD(actions); + ASSERT_RTNL(); tcf_exts_to_list(exts, &actions); tcf_action_destroy(&actions, TCA_ACT_UNBIND); kfree(exts->actions); -- 2.13.0