From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 00/20] net: sched: convert cls ndo_setup_tc offload calls to per-block callbacks Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:15:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20171025121503.GA1910@nanopsycho> References: <20171019135048.4306-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20171021.030446.967534081159629805.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: David Miller , Netdev , Jamal Hadi Salim , Cong Wang , mlxsw@mellanox.com, Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , Michael Chan , Ganesh Goudar , Jeff Kirsher , Saeed Mahameed , Matan Barak , Leon Romanovsky , idosch@mellanox.com, Jakub Kicinski , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Simon Horman , pieter.jansenvanvuuren@netronome.com, john.hurl To: Alexander Duyck Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com ([209.85.128.196]:53461 "EHLO mail-wr0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750852AbdJYMPN (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:15:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f196.google.com with SMTP id u40so17933492wrf.10 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 05:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 06:01:34PM CEST, alexander.duyck@gmail.com wrote: [...] >1. To offload filter into HW, the hw-tc-offload feature flag has >to be turned on before creating the ingress qdisc. > >Previously, this could also be turned on after the qdisc was created >and the filters could still be offloaded. Looks like this is because, >previously the offload flag was checked as a part of filter >integration in the classifier, and now it is checked as part of qdisc >creation (ingress_init). So, if no offload capability is advertised at >ingress qdisc creation time then hardware will not be asked to offload >filters later if the flag is enabled. I have patchset that fixes this in my queue now. Will do some smoke testing and send later today. > >2. Deleting the ingress qdisc fails to remove filters added in >HW. Filters in SW gets deleted. > >We haven’t exactly root-caused this, the changes being extensive, but >our guess is again something wrong with the offload check or similar >while unregistering the block callback (tcf_block_cb_unregister) and >further to the classifier (CLS_U32/CLS_FLOWER etc.) with the >DESTROY/REMOVE command. Hmm. How does this worked previously. I mean, do you see change of behaviour? I'm asking because I don't see how rules added only to HW could be removed, driver should care of it. Or are you talking about rules added to both SW and HW? Thanks!