From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 00/20] net: sched: convert cls ndo_setup_tc offload calls to per-block callbacks Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 09:20:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20171028072031.GC1980@nanopsycho.orion> References: <20171019135048.4306-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20171021.030446.967534081159629805.davem@davemloft.net> <20171025121503.GA1910@nanopsycho> <2e4baa66-35e3-0259-6228-ab05ec826345@intel.com> <20171027072730.GB1980@nanopsycho.orion> <20171027175200.018ebe65@cakuba.netronome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "Nambiar, Amritha" , Alexander Duyck , David Miller , Netdev , Jamal Hadi Salim , Cong Wang , mlxsw@mellanox.com, Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , Michael Chan , Ganesh Goudar , Jeff Kirsher , Saeed Mahameed , Matan Barak , Leon Romanovsky , idosch@mellanox.com, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Simon Horman , To: Jakub Kicinski Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:46303 "EHLO mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750788AbdJ1HUd (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Oct 2017 03:20:33 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f193.google.com with SMTP id l1so7984131wrc.3 for ; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 00:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171027175200.018ebe65@cakuba.netronome.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 02:52:00AM CEST, kubakici@wp.pl wrote: >On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:27:30 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> >>> 2. Deleting the ingress qdisc fails to remove filters added in >> >>> HW. Filters in SW gets deleted. >> >>> >> >>> We haven’t exactly root-caused this, the changes being extensive, but >> >>> our guess is again something wrong with the offload check or similar >> >>> while unregistering the block callback (tcf_block_cb_unregister) and >> >>> further to the classifier (CLS_U32/CLS_FLOWER etc.) with the >> >>> DESTROY/REMOVE command. >> >> >> >> Hmm. How does this worked previously. I mean, do you see change of >> >> behaviour? I'm asking because I don't see how rules added only to HW >> >> could be removed, driver should care of it. Or are you talking about >> >> rules added to both SW and HW? >> > >> >These are rules added to both SW and HW. Previously all cls_* had >> >ndo_setup_tc calls based on the offload capability. >> > >> >commit 8d26d5636d "net: sched: avoid ndo_setup_tc calls for >> >TC_SETUP_CLS*" removed this bit to work with the new block callback. Is >> >there something similar in the block callback flow while acting on the >> >tcf_proto destroy call initiated when the qdisc is cleared? >> >> Yes, it is the same. > >FWIW I also see what Amritha and Alex are describing here, for cls_bpf >there are no DESTROYs coming on rmmod or qdisc del. There is a DESTROY >if I manually remove the filter (or if an ADD with skip_sw fails). Is this different to the original behaviour? Just for cls_bpf?