From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 1/6] IB/uverbs: Allow CQ moderation with modify CQ Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 17:07:53 -0600 Message-ID: <20171030230753.GB4081@ziepe.ca> References: <20171029135140.32649-1-leon@kernel.org> <20171029135140.32649-2-leon@kernel.org> <20171029174345.GC4488@ziepe.ca> <20171029182808.GN16127@mtr-leonro.local> <20171030144807.GA12392@ziepe.ca> <20171030152815.GA16127@mtr-leonro.local> <20171030155236.GC12392@ziepe.ca> <20171030190952.GC16127@mtr-leonro.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171030190952.GC16127-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Doug Ledford , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Yonatan Cohen List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:09:52PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > However, I don't think that kernel to libibverbs API should follow the > same path. The centralized entry points to the kernel provides better > enforcement and minimizes system call bloat. How so? I didn't think selinux intersected with the CQs at all.. I've never worried about the # of verbs entries, we have so many already. I also don't like the modify semantic, because IMHO, modify should mirror create, and we don't specify the moderation parameters during create. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html