From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:11465 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756718AbdKDOVG (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Nov 2017 10:21:06 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 22:20:15 +0800 From: Lu Fengqi To: Qu Wenruo CC: , Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] btrfs-progs: qgroup-verify: Move qgroup classification out of report_qgroups Message-ID: <20171104142015.GB513@fnst.localdomain> References: <20171027072936.4697-1-wqu@suse.com> <20171027072936.4697-4-wqu@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <20171027072936.4697-4-wqu@suse.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 03:29:31PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >The original qgroup-verify integrates qgroup classification into >report_qgroups(). >This behavior makes silent qgroup repair (or offline rescan) impossible. > >To repair qgroup, we must call report_qgroups() to trigger bad qgroup >classification, which will output error message. > >This patch moves bad qgroup classification from report_qgroups() to >qgroup_verify_all(). >The functionality is not changed, but provides the basis for later >silent qgroup repair. > >Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo >--- > qgroup-verify.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/qgroup-verify.c b/qgroup-verify.c >index f509cdb9317a..67bd8b96ddd3 100644 >--- a/qgroup-verify.c >+++ b/qgroup-verify.c >@@ -1319,8 +1319,7 @@ void report_qgroups(int all) > while (node) { > c = rb_entry(node, struct qgroup_count, rb_node); > >- if (report_qgroup_difference(c, all)) >- list_add_tail(&c->bad_list, &bad_qgroups); >+ report_qgroup_difference(c, all); > > node = rb_next(node); > } >@@ -1358,9 +1357,20 @@ void free_qgroup_counts(void) > } > } > >+static bool is_bad_qgroup(struct qgroup_count *count) >+{ >+ struct qgroup_info *info = &count->info; >+ struct qgroup_info *disk = &count->diskinfo; >+ s64 excl_diff = info->exclusive - disk->exclusive; >+ s64 ref_diff = info->referenced - disk->referenced; >+ >+ return (excl_diff || ref_diff); >+} >+ The function is_bad_qgroup can be reused in report_qgroup_difference. > int qgroup_verify_all(struct btrfs_fs_info *info) > { > int ret; >+ struct rb_node *node; > > if (!info->quota_enabled) > return 0; >@@ -1395,6 +1405,20 @@ int qgroup_verify_all(struct btrfs_fs_info *info) > > ret = account_all_refs(1, 0); > >+ /* >+ * Do the correctness check here, so for callers who don't want >+ * verbose report can skip calling report_qgroups() >+ */ >+ node = rb_first(&counts.root); >+ while (node) { >+ struct qgroup_count *c; >+ >+ c = rb_entry(node, struct qgroup_count, rb_node); >+ if (is_bad_qgroup(c)) >+ list_add_tail(&c->bad_list, &bad_qgroups); >+ node = rb_next(node); >+ } >+ > out: > /* > * Don't free the qgroup count records as they will be walked >-- >2.14.3 > >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- Thanks, Lu