All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 7/9] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling
Date: Sat,  4 Nov 2017 21:20:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171104202009.3818-8-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171104202009.3818-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations

diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations b/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..966610aa4620fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+=================
+Linux I2C and DMA
+=================
+
+Given that i2c is a low-speed bus, over which the majority of messages
+transferred are small, it is not considered a prime user of DMA access. At this
+time of writing, only 10% of I2C bus master drivers have DMA support
+implemented. And the vast majority of transactions are so small that setting up
+DMA for it will likely add more overhead than a plain PIO transfer.
+
+Therefore, it is *not* mandatory that the buffer of an I2C message is DMA safe.
+It does not seem reasonable to apply additional burdens when the feature is so
+rarely used. However, it is recommended to use a DMA-safe buffer if your
+message size is likely applicable for DMA. Most drivers have this threshold
+around 8 bytes (as of today, this is mostly an educated guess, however). For
+any message of 16 byte or larger, it is probably a really good idea. Please
+note that other subsystems you use might add requirements. E.g., if your
+I2C bus master driver is using USB as a bridge, then you need to have DMA
+safe buffers always, because USB requires it.
+
+Clients
+-------
+
+For clients, if you use a DMA safe buffer in i2c_msg, set the I2C_M_DMA_SAFE
+flag with it. Then, the I2C core and drivers know they can safely operate DMA
+on it. Note that using this flag is optional. I2C host drivers which are not
+updated to use this flag will work like before. And like before, they risk
+using an unsafe DMA buffer. To improve this situation, using I2C_M_DMA_SAFE in
+more and more clients and host drivers is the planned way forward. Note also
+that setting this flag makes only sense in kernel space. User space data is
+copied into kernel space anyhow. The I2C core makes sure the destination
+buffers in kernel space are always DMA capable. Also, when the core emulates
+SMBus transactions via I2C, the buffers for block transfers are DMA safe. Users
+of i2c_master_send() and i2c_master_recv() functions can now use DMA safe
+variants (i2c_master_send_dmasafe() and i2c_master_recv_dmasafe()) once they
+know their buffers are DMA safe. Users of i2c_transfer() must set the
+I2C_M_DMA_SAFE flag manually.
+
+Masters
+-------
+
+Bus master drivers wishing to implement safe DMA can use helper functions from
+the I2C core. One gives you a DMA-safe buffer for a given i2c_msg as long as a
+certain threshold is met::
+
+	dma_buf = i2c_get_dma_safe_msg_buf(msg, threshold_in_byte);
+
+If a buffer is returned, it is either msg->buf for the I2C_M_DMA_SAFE case or a
+bounce buffer. But you don't need to care about that detail, just use the
+returned buffer. If NULL is returned, the threshold was not met or a bounce
+buffer could not be allocated. Fall back to PIO in that case.
+
+In any case, a buffer obtained from above needs to be released. It ensures data
+is copied back to the message and a potentially used bounce buffer is freed::
+
+	i2c_release_dma_safe_msg_buf(msg, dma_buf);
+
+The bounce buffer handling from the core is generic and simple. It will always
+allocate a new bounce buffer. If you want a more sophisticated handling (e.g.
+reusing pre-allocated buffers), you are free to implement your own.
+
+Please also check the in-kernel documentation for details. The i2c-sh_mobile
+driver can be used as a reference example how to use the above helpers.
+
+Final note: If you plan to use DMA with I2C (or with anything else, actually)
+make sure you have CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG enabled during development. It can help
+you find various issues which can be complex to debug otherwise.
-- 
2.11.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-04 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-04 20:20 [PATCH v6 0/9] i2c: document DMA handling and add helpers for it Wolfram Sang
2017-11-04 20:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-11-04 20:20 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] i2c: add a message flag for DMA safe buffers Wolfram Sang
2017-11-04 20:20 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] i2c: add helpers to ease DMA handling Wolfram Sang
2017-11-04 20:20   ` Wolfram Sang
2017-11-04 20:20 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] i2c: dev: mark RDWR buffers as DMA_SAFE Wolfram Sang
2017-11-04 20:20   ` Wolfram Sang
2017-11-04 20:20 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] i2c: refactor i2c_master_{send_recv} Wolfram Sang
2017-11-11  0:03   ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-11  0:03     ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-04 20:20 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] i2c: add i2c_master_{send|recv}_dmasafe Wolfram Sang
2017-11-11  0:08   ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-11  0:08     ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-04 20:20 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] i2c: smbus: use DMA safe buffers for emulated SMBus transactions Wolfram Sang
2017-11-11  0:13   ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-11  0:13     ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-04 20:20 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2017-11-04 20:20 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] i2c: sh_mobile: use core helper to decide when to use DMA Wolfram Sang
2017-11-04 20:20 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] i2c: rcar: skip DMA if buffer is not safe Wolfram Sang
2017-11-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v6 0/9] i2c: document DMA handling and add helpers for it Mark Brown
2017-11-27 18:51   ` Wolfram Sang
2017-11-28 15:34     ` Mark Brown
2017-12-03 19:43       ` Wolfram Sang
2017-12-04 22:05         ` Mark Brown
2017-12-04 22:05           ` Mark Brown
2017-12-05 11:00           ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-12-05 11:00             ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-12-04 21:25 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171104202009.3818-8-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@s-opensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.