From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo de Lara Subject: Re: [PATCH] maintainers: fill git trees for net and crypto API Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 16:38:22 +0000 Message-ID: <20171106163822.2849-1-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> References: <20171106113651.10783-1-thomas@monjalon.net> Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4181B2CF for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:38:27 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20171106113651.10783-1-thomas@monjalon.net> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 11:37 AM > To: Yigit, Ferruh ; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: fill git trees for net and > crypto API > > The ethdev API (including rte_flow) is managed in the dpdk-next-net tree. > The crypto and security API is managed in the dpdk-next-crypto tree. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > --- > > Pablo, do you agree to manage rte_security patches in the crypto tree? Hi Thomas, I think it will depend on the amount of work that will be done in the network drivers in the future. Can anyone working on the security library say how much work is expected to be done there? If there is not going to be huge work there, I don't mind taking this in the subtree. Thanks, Pablo