All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [vlan_device_event] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6ccf
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:48:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171109064817.acpe4ys5mlz23dvo@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171109024308.o7yvok36u47mh7fh@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:43:08AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>>Of course, if it's bisectable, that would be great too.
>>
>>Yes, bisect is on the way. So far it's bisecting in the 4.12 commits.
>
>The bisect was unsuccessful due to an unrelated DRM_BOCHS oops in 4.11.
>Disabling the buggy driver, I managed to reproduce the
>vlan_device_event bug in 4.11. However only to find the older kernels
>suffer from different kind of oops, which make the bisect troublesome.
>
>% grep -E 'dmesg.(BUG|EIP)' v4.*/matrix.json
>v4.10/matrix.json:  "dmesg.BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel": [
>v4.10/matrix.json:  "dmesg.EIP:kobject_get": [
>v4.10/matrix.json:  "dmesg.BUG:kernel_reboot-without-warning_in_test_stage": [
>v4.11/matrix.json:  "dmesg.BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel": [
>v4.11/matrix.json:  "dmesg.EIP:vlan_device_event": [
>v4.8/matrix.json:  "dmesg.BUG:kernel_reboot-without-warning_in_early-boot_stage,last_printk:Decompressing_Linux": [
>v4.9/matrix.json:  "dmesg.BUG:key_not_in.data": [
>
>I'll try tuning kconfig to get a good bisect base.
>
>Hopefully we'll make the coming RC releases free from such bisect
>stoppers with better regression tracking and bisect automation.

However if the situation turns out to be not that optimistic, we might
track "bisect stopper" kconfig options over kernel releases. For
bisect scripts to auto pick them up.

An example kconfig bisect-blacklist file would be:

        $ cat tools/testing/configs/bisect-4.12.config
        # CONFIG_DRM_BOCHS is not set

That would mean:

        CONFIG_DRM_BOCHS will reliably stop kernel from booting before 4.12.
        If ever bisecting into pre-4.12 kernels, better disable it.

The best fit would be the uncommon drivers and optional features.

Warnings are typically not bisect stoppers so can be ignored. Kernel
panics that happen rare enough to impact bisect may also be ignored.

Thanks,
Fengguang

      reply	other threads:[~2017-11-09  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-07 10:21 [vlan_device_event] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6ccf Fengguang Wu
2017-11-07 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-07 16:46   ` Fengguang Wu
2017-11-08  9:48   ` Fengguang Wu
2017-11-08 16:20     ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-08 16:20       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2017-11-08 17:12       ` Fengguang Wu
2017-11-08 17:12         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Fengguang Wu
2017-11-08 17:18         ` Fengguang Wu
2017-11-08 17:18           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Fengguang Wu
2017-11-08 18:05         ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-08 18:05           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2017-11-08 18:36         ` Alexander Duyck
2017-11-08 18:36           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Duyck
2017-11-09  3:12           ` Fengguang Wu
2017-11-09  3:12             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Fengguang Wu
2017-11-09  4:09             ` Fengguang Wu
2017-11-09  4:09               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Fengguang Wu
2017-11-09  7:22               ` Fengguang Wu
2017-11-09  7:22                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Fengguang Wu
2017-11-09  6:34             ` Cong Wang
2017-11-09  6:34               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Cong Wang
2017-11-09  6:55               ` Fengguang Wu
2017-11-09  6:55                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Fengguang Wu
2017-11-09  7:43                 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-11-09  7:43                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Fengguang Wu
2017-11-09 15:51               ` Girish Moodalbail
2017-11-09 15:51                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Girish Moodalbail
2017-11-10  0:16                 ` Cong Wang
2017-11-10  0:16                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Cong Wang
2017-11-12 19:31         ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-12 19:31           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2017-11-13  1:13           ` CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT impacts on faddr2line Fengguang Wu
2017-11-13  1:13             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Fengguang Wu
2017-11-13  2:05             ` Zhang Rui
2017-11-13  2:05               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Zhang Rui
2017-11-13  2:22               ` Fengguang Wu
2017-11-13  2:22                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Fengguang Wu
2017-11-13 18:52             ` Andi Kleen
2017-11-13 18:52               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Andi Kleen
2017-11-13 19:14               ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-13 19:14                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2017-11-13 20:10                 ` Andi Kleen
2017-11-13 20:10                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Andi Kleen
2017-11-13 20:14                   ` H.J. Lu
2017-11-13 20:14                     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " H.J. Lu
2017-11-13 20:56                   ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-13 20:56                     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2017-11-13 21:41                     ` Andi Kleen
2017-11-13 21:41                       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Andi Kleen
2017-11-13 21:57                       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-13 21:57                         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2017-11-13 23:51                         ` Andi Kleen
2017-11-13 23:51                           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Andi Kleen
2017-11-14  8:13               ` Fengguang Wu
2017-11-14  8:13                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Fengguang Wu
2017-11-09  2:43     ` [vlan_device_event] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6ccf Fengguang Wu
2017-11-09  6:48       ` Fengguang Wu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171109064817.acpe4ys5mlz23dvo@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.