From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753407AbdKJRYh (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:24:37 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:45242 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753230AbdKJRYg (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:24:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 18:24:35 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Anil Gurumurthy , Sudarsana Kalluru , "James E . J . Bottomley" , "Martin K . Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, y2038@lists.linaro.org, hch@lst.de, hare@suse.com, jthumshirn@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] scsi: bfa: do_gettimeofday removal Message-ID: <20171110172435.GB15288@lst.de> References: <20171110153715.1929456-1-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171110153715.1929456-1-arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This stuff look ok - but I have a bigger question and that is if bfa is still alive at all. Everytime I look at it I have doubts if it works at all, so I wonder if we need to keep it on life support.