All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Display WA #1185 WaDisableDARBFClkGating:cnl, glk
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:44:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171110204401.GJ10981@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171110202424.tahfygkow6i4dxlh@intel.com>

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:24:24PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:13:44PM +0000, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 02:26:32PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > Display is not sending a PMRsp when a PMReq is received
> > > at the same time that all planes are turned off.
> > > State machine in the dcprunit is stuck in the WAIT4DONE
> > > state which means that there is no fill_done.
> > > 
> > > WA: disable arbiter clock gating, set bit [27] of 0x46530
> > > 
> > > v2: As Ville pointed out, based on the description the issue
> > >     can happen when disabling the planes, similar to
> > >     WaRsPkgCStateDisplayPMReq:hsw
> > >     Also description of the issue was updated on commit
> > >     message to make it more clear that we need this
> > >     earlier.
> > 
> > I guess we don't know exactly if this has the same ordering requirements
> > as WaRsPkgCStateDisplayPMReq:hsw. But playing it safe can't hurt I
> > suppose.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h      |  1 +
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
> > >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > index 6ef33422f762..fc8c5f8260f6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > @@ -3819,6 +3819,7 @@ enum {
> > >   * GEN9 clock gating regs
> > >   */
> > >  #define GEN9_CLKGATE_DIS_0		_MMIO(0x46530)
> > > +#define   DARBF_GATING_DIS		(1 << 27)
> > >  #define   PWM2_GATING_DIS		(1 << 14)
> > >  #define   PWM1_GATING_DIS		(1 << 13)
> > >  
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > index 84817ccc5305..a038610b66cc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > @@ -15080,6 +15080,20 @@ get_encoder_power_domains(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +/* System hang if this isn't done before disabling all planes! */
> > > +static void intel_early_display_was(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > +{
> > > +	/* Display WA #1185 WaDisableDARBFClkGating:cnl,glk */
> > > +	if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > 
> > Bspec says GLK isn't affected.
> 
> Bspec refers to GLK as Gen10 display...
> so GEN10:All is also GLK...
> but if you look 2 columns ahead you see this:
> GEN:BUG:1947072 [CNL, GLK]

Ah. And the hsd does indeed list glk as well.

> 
> > 
> > > +		I915_WRITE(GEN9_CLKGATE_DIS_0, I915_READ(GEN9_CLKGATE_DIS_0) |
> > > +			   DARBF_GATING_DIS);
> > > +
> > > +	/* WaRsPkgCStateDisplayPMReq:hsw */
> > 
> > Please keep the comment about the hsw system hangs here. The next guy to
> > touch this code is probably not going to be aware of it, or may simply
> > have forgotten it already.
> 
> makes sense...
> should I keep the one in the function comment as well? and duplicate
> the comment on the new one or since we are not that sure we just leave
> the comment close to the hsw one?

I'd just keep it on the hsw one since we know that's how it works
on hsw. Having it on the cnl/glk one would be more speculation at
this point.

> 
> > 
> > With that those addresses this is
> > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> thanks
> 
> > 
> > > +	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
> > > +		I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_PAR1_1,
> > > +			   I915_READ(CHICKEN_PAR1_1) | FORCE_ARB_IDLE_PLANES);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /* Scan out the current hw modeset state,
> > >   * and sanitizes it to the current state
> > >   */
> > > @@ -15093,15 +15107,7 @@ intel_modeset_setup_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev,
> > >  	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> > >  	int i;
> > >  
> > > -	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv)) {
> > > -		/*
> > > -		 * WaRsPkgCStateDisplayPMReq:hsw
> > > -		 * System hang if this isn't done before disabling all planes!
> > > -		 */
> > > -		I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_PAR1_1,
> > > -			   I915_READ(CHICKEN_PAR1_1) | FORCE_ARB_IDLE_PLANES);
> > > -	}
> > > -
> > > +	intel_early_display_was(dev_priv);
> > >  	intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(dev);
> > >  
> > >  	/* HW state is read out, now we need to sanitize this mess. */
> > > -- 
> > > 2.13.6
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel OTC

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-10 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-08 23:30 [PATCH] drm/i915: Display WA #1185 WaDisableDARBFClkGating:cnl, glk Rodrigo Vivi
2017-11-08 23:48 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
2017-11-09  0:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2017-11-09  0:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-11-09  1:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning " Patchwork
2017-11-09 13:20 ` [PATCH] " Imre Deak
2017-11-09 13:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-11-09 17:58   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-11-09 18:05     ` Chris Wilson
2017-11-09 22:26   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-11-10 20:13     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-11-10 20:24       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-11-10 20:44         ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-11-10 20:58           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-11-10 21:11             ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-11-10 21:17               ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-11-11  0:03               ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-11-09 22:43 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Display WA #1185 WaDisableDARBFClkGating:cnl, glk (rev2) Patchwork
2017-11-09 23:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2017-11-10 21:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Display WA #1185 WaDisableDARBFClkGating:cnl, glk (rev3) Patchwork
2017-11-10 23:00 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-11-11  0:22 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Display WA #1185 WaDisableDARBFClkGating:cnl, glk (rev4) Patchwork
2017-11-13 23:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2017-11-14  0:38 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-11-14  1:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171110204401.GJ10981@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.