From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1423118AbdKQXAp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:00:45 -0500
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51536 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1423099AbdKQXAh (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:00:37 -0500
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2221E218D7
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:00:34 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
        Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 4/7] timekeeping: Add NMI safe accessor to
 mono/boot/real clocks
Message-ID: <20171117180034.30413b64@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20171115182657.463124645@linutronix.de>
References: <20171115181531.322572387@linutronix.de>
        <20171115182657.463124645@linutronix.de>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:15:35 +0100
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> +static notrace u64 __ktime_get_real_fast(struct tk_fast *tkf, u64 *mono)
>  {
>  	struct tk_read_base *tkr;
> +	u64 basem, baser, delta;
>  	unsigned int seq;
> -	u64 now;
>  
>  	do {
>  		seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(&tkf->seq);
>  		tkr = tkf->base + (seq & 0x01);
> -		now = ktime_to_ns(tkr->base_real);
> +		basem = ktime_to_ns(tkr->base);
> +		baser = ktime_to_ns(tkr->base_real);
>  
> -		now += timekeeping_delta_to_ns(tkr,
> -				clocksource_delta(
> -					tk_clock_read(tkr),
> -					tkr->cycle_last,
> -					tkr->mask));
> +		delta = timekeeping_delta_to_ns(tkr,
> +				clocksource_delta(tk_clock_read(tkr),
> +				tkr->cycle_last, tkr->mask));

Could you indent this better. It looks like timekeeping_delta_to_ns()
takes 4 arguments, when it really only takes two.

		delta = timekeeping_dela_to_ns(tkr,
				clocksource_delta(tk_clock_read(tkr),
					tkr->cycle_last, tkr->mask));

Would point out, at least, that it takes two arguments, and
clocksource_delta() takes three (not one).

-- Steve