From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762962AbdKRACp (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:02:45 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:53034 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423426AbdKRACV (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:02:21 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,411,1505804400"; d="scan'208";a="150599946" From: Pierre-Louis Bossart To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: tiwai@suse.de, broonie@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, vinod.koul@intel.com, liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pierre-Louis Bossart Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Fix Intel audio Kconfig issues Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:01:55 -0600 Message-Id: <20171118000202.22302-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At the risk of being scolded for the third time in two days by Linux overlords (no hard feelings), here's an attempt to clean things up. The first patch *should* implement what Linus, Takashi and Mark tried to explain by email. There should be no functionality change and could be merged if deemed ok. The rest of the patch series does a more in-depth cleanup and should not be merged without more testing (hence the RFC). The 4th patch is really the most important one, there were nested configs which made no sense to me. I don't know the history which led to such complicated stuff but simpler is better. The last 3 patches are just clean-ups of the machine driver configs, for some reason there is no consistency in the settings so I tried to apply common sense. There might be additional cleanup needed since I don't really get why we need references to LPSS or DESIGNWARE for things which are not visible to a machine driver, we should only depend on IC2 or SPI in my opinion - depending on what the control interface is. I tried to keep things to a minimum in each patch to make the reviews easier, if people want them squashed that's fine by me. I'll do some more testing on my side but I could use feedback. Thanks! Pierre-Louis Bossart (7): ASoC: Intel: Fix Kconfig ASoC: Intel: Kconfig: Simplify-clarify ACPI/PCI dependencies ASoC: Intel: document what Kconfig options do ASoC: Intel: Fix nested/unnecessary Kconfig dependencies ASoC: Intel: boards: align Kconfig dependencies for Haswell/Broadwell ASoC: Intel: boards: align Kconfig configurations for HiFi2 ASoC: Intel: boards: align/fix SKL/BXT/KBL Kconfigs sound/soc/intel/Kconfig | 89 ++++++++++++++++++-------- sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) -- 2.14.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Fix Intel audio Kconfig issues Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:01:55 -0600 Message-ID: <20171118000202.22302-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A368A266B67 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 01:02:23 +0100 (CET) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: arnd@arndb.de, tiwai@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pierre-Louis Bossart , liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com, vinod.koul@intel.com, broonie@kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At the risk of being scolded for the third time in two days by Linux overlords (no hard feelings), here's an attempt to clean things up. The first patch *should* implement what Linus, Takashi and Mark tried to explain by email. There should be no functionality change and could be merged if deemed ok. The rest of the patch series does a more in-depth cleanup and should not be merged without more testing (hence the RFC). The 4th patch is really the most important one, there were nested configs which made no sense to me. I don't know the history which led to such complicated stuff but simpler is better. The last 3 patches are just clean-ups of the machine driver configs, for some reason there is no consistency in the settings so I tried to apply common sense. There might be additional cleanup needed since I don't really get why we need references to LPSS or DESIGNWARE for things which are not visible to a machine driver, we should only depend on IC2 or SPI in my opinion - depending on what the control interface is. I tried to keep things to a minimum in each patch to make the reviews easier, if people want them squashed that's fine by me. I'll do some more testing on my side but I could use feedback. Thanks! Pierre-Louis Bossart (7): ASoC: Intel: Fix Kconfig ASoC: Intel: Kconfig: Simplify-clarify ACPI/PCI dependencies ASoC: Intel: document what Kconfig options do ASoC: Intel: Fix nested/unnecessary Kconfig dependencies ASoC: Intel: boards: align Kconfig dependencies for Haswell/Broadwell ASoC: Intel: boards: align Kconfig configurations for HiFi2 ASoC: Intel: boards: align/fix SKL/BXT/KBL Kconfigs sound/soc/intel/Kconfig | 89 ++++++++++++++++++-------- sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) -- 2.14.1