From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:43778 "EHLO mail-wm0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751155AbdKTPEu (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:04:50 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x63so19434469wmf.2 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 07:04:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:04:46 +0100 From: Carlos Maiolino Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] xfs: Properly retry failed dquot items in case of error during buffer writeback Message-ID: <20171120150446.33sftuqo7iwyjkk7@odin.localdomain> References: <20170825120752.22553-1-cmaiolino@redhat.com> <20170825170400.GS4796@magnolia> <20170825215701.GT4796@magnolia> <20170828092030.l5z2hruccr7ctvl3@hades.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Hou Tao Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Hi, > > > > I still don't have a xfstests to cover it, I couldn't reproduce the problem with > > dquots yet, I'll focus more on this soon. > I had written an xfstest case for the umount hang problem which is caused by the > writeback of the dquota update, and it can be reproduced reliably. If you don't mind, > i will clean it up and post to xfstest maillist this week. > Same thing, I missed this e-mail. If you haven't already, go for it, I'll test my patch against it too. Cheers -- Carlos