All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v5 1/4] HID: multitouch: Fix alphabetic sorting of mt_devices table.
@ 2017-11-22 11:57 Hans de Goede
  2017-11-22 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] HID: multitouch: Properly deal with Win8 PTP reports with 0 touches Hans de Goede
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2017-11-22 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Kosina, Benjamin Tissoires; +Cc: Hans de Goede, linux-input

Fix alphabetic sorting of mt_devices hid_device_id table.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
index 65ea23be9677..9ef24b518f12 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
@@ -1649,14 +1649,6 @@ static const struct hid_device_id mt_devices[] = {
 		MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_TURBOX,
 			USB_DEVICE_ID_TURBOX_TOUCHSCREEN_MOSART) },
 
-	/* Panasonic panels */
-	{ .driver_data = MT_CLS_PANASONIC,
-		MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PANASONIC,
-			USB_DEVICE_ID_PANABOARD_UBT780) },
-	{ .driver_data = MT_CLS_PANASONIC,
-		MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PANASONIC,
-			USB_DEVICE_ID_PANABOARD_UBT880) },
-
 	/* Novatek Panel */
 	{ .driver_data = MT_CLS_NSMU,
 		MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_NOVATEK,
@@ -1667,6 +1659,14 @@ static const struct hid_device_id mt_devices[] = {
 		HID_DEVICE(BUS_I2C, HID_GROUP_MULTITOUCH_WIN_8,
 			USB_VENDOR_ID_NTRIG, 0x1b05) },
 
+	/* Panasonic panels */
+	{ .driver_data = MT_CLS_PANASONIC,
+		MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PANASONIC,
+			USB_DEVICE_ID_PANABOARD_UBT780) },
+	{ .driver_data = MT_CLS_PANASONIC,
+		MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PANASONIC,
+			USB_DEVICE_ID_PANABOARD_UBT880) },
+
 	/* PixArt optical touch screen */
 	{ .driver_data = MT_CLS_INRANGE_CONTACTNUMBER,
 		MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PIXART,
-- 
2.14.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 2/4] HID: multitouch: Properly deal with Win8 PTP reports with 0 touches
  2017-11-22 11:57 [PATCH v5 1/4] HID: multitouch: Fix alphabetic sorting of mt_devices table Hans de Goede
@ 2017-11-22 11:57 ` Hans de Goede
  2017-11-22 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] HID: multitouch: Only look at non touch fields in first packet of a frame Hans de Goede
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2017-11-22 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Kosina, Benjamin Tissoires; +Cc: Hans de Goede, linux-input

The Windows Precision Touchpad spec "Figure 4 Button Only Down and Up"
and "Table 9 Report Sequence for Button Only Down and Up" indicate
that the first packet of a (possibly hybrid mode multi-packet) frame
may contain a contact-count of 0 if only a button is pressed and no
fingers are detected.

This means that a value of 0 for contact-count is a valid value and
should be used as expected contact count when it is the first packet
(num_received == 0), as extra check to make sure that this is the first
packet of a buttons only frame, we also check that the timestamp is
different.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
---
Changes in v2:
-New patch in v2 of this patch-set

Changes in v3:
-Also check timestamps to make sure we're dealing with the first-packet
 of a frame

Changes in v4:
-Add Benjamin's Reviewed-by

Changes in v5:
-Rebase on top of latest upstream, which already has some HID_DG_SCANTIME
 handling
---
 drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
index 9ef24b518f12..d8b1cad74faf 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
@@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ struct mt_device {
 	unsigned long mt_io_flags;	/* mt flags (MT_IO_FLAGS_*) */
 	int cc_index;	/* contact count field index in the report */
 	int cc_value_index;	/* contact count value index in the field */
+	int scantime_index;	/* scantime field index in the report */
+	int scantime_val_index;	/* scantime value index in the field */
+	int prev_scantime;	/* scantime reported in the previous packet */
 	unsigned last_slot_field;	/* the last field of a slot */
 	unsigned mt_report_id;	/* the report ID of the multitouch device */
 	unsigned long initial_quirks;	/* initial quirks state */
@@ -599,6 +602,12 @@ static int mt_touch_input_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
 				EV_MSC, MSC_TIMESTAMP);
 			input_set_capability(hi->input, EV_MSC, MSC_TIMESTAMP);
 			mt_store_field(usage, td, hi);
+			/* Ignore if indexes are out of bounds. */
+			if (field->index >= field->report->maxfield ||
+			    usage->usage_index >= field->report_count)
+				return 1;
+			td->scantime_index = field->index;
+			td->scantime_val_index = usage->usage_index;
 			return 1;
 		case HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT:
 			/* Ignore if indexes are out of bounds. */
@@ -855,9 +864,10 @@ static void mt_process_mt_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
 static void mt_touch_report(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *report)
 {
 	struct mt_device *td = hid_get_drvdata(hid);
+	__s32 cls = td->mtclass.name;
 	struct hid_field *field;
 	unsigned count;
-	int r, n;
+	int r, n, scantime = 0;
 
 	/* sticky fingers release in progress, abort */
 	if (test_and_set_bit(MT_IO_FLAGS_RUNNING, &td->mt_io_flags))
@@ -867,12 +877,29 @@ static void mt_touch_report(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *report)
 	 * Includes multi-packet support where subsequent
 	 * packets are sent with zero contactcount.
 	 */
+	if (td->scantime_index >= 0) {
+		field = report->field[td->scantime_index];
+		scantime = field->value[td->scantime_val_index];
+	}
 	if (td->cc_index >= 0) {
 		struct hid_field *field = report->field[td->cc_index];
 		int value = field->value[td->cc_value_index];
-		if (value)
+
+		/*
+		 * For Win8 PTPs the first packet (td->num_received == 0) may
+		 * have a contactcount of 0 if there only is a button event.
+		 * We double check that this is not a continuation packet
+		 * of a possible multi-packet frame be checking that the
+		 * timestamp has changed.
+		 */
+		if ((cls == MT_CLS_WIN_8 || cls == MT_CLS_WIN_8_DUAL) &&
+		    td->num_received == 0 && td->prev_scantime != scantime)
+			td->num_expected = value;
+		/* A non 0 contact count always indicates a first packet */
+		else if (value)
 			td->num_expected = value;
 	}
+	td->prev_scantime = scantime;
 
 	for (r = 0; r < report->maxfield; r++) {
 		field = report->field[r];
@@ -1329,6 +1356,7 @@ static int mt_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
 	td->maxcontact_report_id = -1;
 	td->inputmode_value = MT_INPUTMODE_TOUCHSCREEN;
 	td->cc_index = -1;
+	td->scantime_index = -1;
 	td->mt_report_id = -1;
 	hid_set_drvdata(hdev, td);
 
-- 
2.14.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 3/4] HID: multitouch: Only look at non touch fields in first packet of a frame
  2017-11-22 11:57 [PATCH v5 1/4] HID: multitouch: Fix alphabetic sorting of mt_devices table Hans de Goede
  2017-11-22 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] HID: multitouch: Properly deal with Win8 PTP reports with 0 touches Hans de Goede
@ 2017-11-22 11:57 ` Hans de Goede
  2017-11-22 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] HID: multitouch: Combine all left-button events in " Hans de Goede
  2017-11-22 15:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] HID: multitouch: Fix alphabetic sorting of mt_devices table Jiri Kosina
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2017-11-22 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Kosina, Benjamin Tissoires; +Cc: Hans de Goede, linux-input

Devices in "single finger hybrid mode" will send one report per finger,
on some devices only the first report of such a multi-packet frame will
contain a value for BTN_LEFT, in subsequent reports (if multiple fingers
are down) the value is always 0, causing hid-mt to report BTN_LEFT going
1 - 0 - 1 - 0 when pressing a clickpad and putting down a second finger.
This happens for example on USB 0603:0002 mt touchpads.

This commit fixes this by only reporting non touch fields for the first
packet of a (possibly) multi-packet frame.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
---
Changes in v4:
-New patch in this patch-set with a new approach focussed on only fixing
 the issues with the USB 0603:0002 mt touchpads
---
 drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
index d8b1cad74faf..760c4a042e6a 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
@@ -787,9 +787,11 @@ static int mt_touch_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
 }
 
 static void mt_process_mt_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
-				struct hid_usage *usage, __s32 value)
+				struct hid_usage *usage, __s32 value,
+				bool first_packet)
 {
 	struct mt_device *td = hid_get_drvdata(hid);
+	__s32 cls = td->mtclass.name;
 	__s32 quirks = td->mtclass.quirks;
 	struct input_dev *input = field->hidinput->input;
 
@@ -846,6 +848,15 @@ static void mt_process_mt_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
 			break;
 
 		default:
+			/*
+			 * For Win8 PTP touchpads we should only look at
+			 * non finger/touch events in the first_packet of
+			 * a (possible) multi-packet frame.
+			 */
+			if ((cls == MT_CLS_WIN_8 || cls == MT_CLS_WIN_8_DUAL) &&
+			    !first_packet)
+				return;
+
 			if (usage->type)
 				input_event(input, usage->type, usage->code,
 						value);
@@ -866,6 +877,7 @@ static void mt_touch_report(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *report)
 	struct mt_device *td = hid_get_drvdata(hid);
 	__s32 cls = td->mtclass.name;
 	struct hid_field *field;
+	bool first_packet;
 	unsigned count;
 	int r, n, scantime = 0;
 
@@ -901,6 +913,7 @@ static void mt_touch_report(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *report)
 	}
 	td->prev_scantime = scantime;
 
+	first_packet = td->num_received == 0;
 	for (r = 0; r < report->maxfield; r++) {
 		field = report->field[r];
 		count = field->report_count;
@@ -910,7 +923,7 @@ static void mt_touch_report(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *report)
 
 		for (n = 0; n < count; n++)
 			mt_process_mt_event(hid, field, &field->usage[n],
-					field->value[n]);
+					    field->value[n], first_packet);
 	}
 
 	if (td->num_received >= td->num_expected)
-- 
2.14.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 4/4] HID: multitouch: Combine all left-button events in a frame
  2017-11-22 11:57 [PATCH v5 1/4] HID: multitouch: Fix alphabetic sorting of mt_devices table Hans de Goede
  2017-11-22 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] HID: multitouch: Properly deal with Win8 PTP reports with 0 touches Hans de Goede
  2017-11-22 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] HID: multitouch: Only look at non touch fields in first packet of a frame Hans de Goede
@ 2017-11-22 11:57 ` Hans de Goede
  2017-11-22 15:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] HID: multitouch: Fix alphabetic sorting of mt_devices table Jiri Kosina
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2017-11-22 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Kosina, Benjamin Tissoires; +Cc: Hans de Goede, linux-input

According to the Win8 Precision Touchpad spec, inside the HID_UP_BUTTON
usage-page usage 1 is for a clickpad getting clicked, 2 for an external
left button and 3 for an external right button. Since Linux uses
BTN_LEFT for a clickpad being clicked we end up mapping both usage 1
and 2 to BTN_LEFT and if a single report contains both then we ended
up always reporting the value of both in a single SYN, e.g. :
BTN_LEFT 1, BTN_LEFT 0, SYN. This happens for example with Hantick
HTT5288 i2c mt touchpads.

This commit fixes this by not immediately reporting left button when we
parse the report, but instead storing or-ing together the values and
reporting the result from mt_sync_frame() when we've a complete frame.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
---
Changes in v2:
-Rewrite of v1 of "HID: multitouch: Fix BTN_LEFT 0-1-0-1 events on Novatek
 mt touchpad" to kill two birds with one stone

Changes in v3:
-Delay reporting for all buttons not just for BTN_LEFT

Changes in v4:
-Back to combining only the value for BTN_LEFT, the other issues are fixed
 with the new "HID: multitouch: Only look at non touch fields in first
 packet of a frame" patch
---
 drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
index 760c4a042e6a..76088f2cf598 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ struct mt_device {
 	int scantime_index;	/* scantime field index in the report */
 	int scantime_val_index;	/* scantime value index in the field */
 	int prev_scantime;	/* scantime reported in the previous packet */
+	int left_button_state;	/* left button state */
 	unsigned last_slot_field;	/* the last field of a slot */
 	unsigned mt_report_id;	/* the report ID of the multitouch device */
 	unsigned long initial_quirks;	/* initial quirks state */
@@ -743,10 +744,16 @@ static void mt_complete_slot(struct mt_device *td, struct input_dev *input)
  */
 static void mt_sync_frame(struct mt_device *td, struct input_dev *input)
 {
+	__s32 cls = td->mtclass.name;
+
+	if (cls == MT_CLS_WIN_8 || cls == MT_CLS_WIN_8_DUAL)
+		input_event(input, EV_KEY, BTN_LEFT, td->left_button_state);
+
 	input_mt_sync_frame(input);
 	input_event(input, EV_MSC, MSC_TIMESTAMP, td->timestamp);
 	input_sync(input);
 	td->num_received = 0;
+	td->left_button_state = 0;
 	if (test_bit(MT_IO_FLAGS_ACTIVE_SLOTS, &td->mt_io_flags))
 		set_bit(MT_IO_FLAGS_PENDING_SLOTS, &td->mt_io_flags);
 	else
@@ -857,6 +864,19 @@ static void mt_process_mt_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
 			    !first_packet)
 				return;
 
+			/*
+			 * For Win8 PTP touchpads we map both the clickpad click
+			 * and any "external" left buttons to BTN_LEFT if a
+			 * device claims to have both we need to report 1 for
+			 * BTN_LEFT if either is pressed, so we or all values
+			 * together and report the result in mt_sync_frame().
+			 */
+			if ((cls == MT_CLS_WIN_8 || cls == MT_CLS_WIN_8_DUAL) &&
+			    usage->type == EV_KEY && usage->code == BTN_LEFT) {
+				td->left_button_state |= value;
+				return;
+			}
+
 			if (usage->type)
 				input_event(input, usage->type, usage->code,
 						value);
-- 
2.14.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] HID: multitouch: Fix alphabetic sorting of mt_devices table.
  2017-11-22 11:57 [PATCH v5 1/4] HID: multitouch: Fix alphabetic sorting of mt_devices table Hans de Goede
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-11-22 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] HID: multitouch: Combine all left-button events in " Hans de Goede
@ 2017-11-22 15:01 ` Jiri Kosina
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2017-11-22 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hans de Goede; +Cc: Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input

I've applied the series to for-4.16/hid-quirks-cleanup/multitouch. Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-22 15:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-22 11:57 [PATCH v5 1/4] HID: multitouch: Fix alphabetic sorting of mt_devices table Hans de Goede
2017-11-22 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] HID: multitouch: Properly deal with Win8 PTP reports with 0 touches Hans de Goede
2017-11-22 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] HID: multitouch: Only look at non touch fields in first packet of a frame Hans de Goede
2017-11-22 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] HID: multitouch: Combine all left-button events in " Hans de Goede
2017-11-22 15:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] HID: multitouch: Fix alphabetic sorting of mt_devices table Jiri Kosina

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.