From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: bruno@wolff.to Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id a8f24f5a for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [98.103.208.27]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with SMTP id 38203476 for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:25:58 -0600 From: Bruno Wolff III To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: Re: Should I expect faster recovery after one side goes down Message-ID: <20171127182558.GA19220@wolff.to> References: <20171127094931.GA3104@wolff.to> <20171127134914.GA9392@wolff.to> <20171127173354.GA17685@wolff.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed In-Reply-To: Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 18:36:23 +0100, "Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote: >Hello Bruno, > >That's some pretty weird behavior, and it sounds like whatever the >cause is is being obscured under layers of systemd. Perhaps come on >into #wireguard on Freenode and we can debug this in real time? I've >got a few ideas. I don't have my laptop with me at work and breaking the wireguard tunnel to it will break my access to it from here. I could check configuration from work. I can bring it with me tomorrow, otherwise I'll probably get home too late for you tonight and I probably won't be up late enough to catch you early tomorrow. Probably I'll be able to reproduce the issue from work.