[Patch net] xfrm: check id proto in validate_tmpl()

* [Patch net] xfrm: check id proto in validate_tmpl()
@ 2017-11-27 19:15 Cong Wang
  2017-11-29 12:15 ` Steffen Klassert
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Cong Wang @ 2017-11-27 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Cong Wang, Steffen Klassert, Herbert Xu

syzbot reported a kernel warning in xfrm_state_fini(), which
indicates that we have entries left in the list
net->xfrm.state_all whose proto is zero. And
xfrm_id_proto_match() doesn't consider them as a match with
IPSEC_PROTO_ANY in this case.

Proto with value 0 is probably not a valid value, at least
verify_newsa_info() doesn't consider it valid either.

This patch fixes it by checking the proto value in
validate_tmpl() and rejecting invalid ones, like what iproute2
does in xfrm_xfrmproto_getbyname().

Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 983b0233767b..c2cfcc6fdb34 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1445,6 +1445,21 @@ static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family)
 		default:
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
+
+		switch (ut[i].id.proto) {
+		case IPPROTO_AH:
+		case IPPROTO_ESP:
+		case IPPROTO_COMP:
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+		case IPPROTO_ROUTING:
+		case IPPROTO_DSTOPTS:
+#endif
+		case IPSEC_PROTO_ANY:
+			break;
+		default:
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.13.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread