All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "async: simplify lowest_in_progress()"
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:36:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171127193637.GK983427@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171120225147.3880-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:51:47PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> This reverts commit 92266d6ef60c2381c980c6cdcb2a5c1667b36b49, which
> was simply wrong: In the case where domain is NULL, we now use the
> wrong offsetof() in the list_first_entry macro, so we don't actually
> fetch the ->cookie value, but rather the eight bytes located
> sizeof(struct list_head) further into the struct async_entry.
> 
> On 64 bit, that's the data member, while on 32 bit, we get a u64 built
> from func and data in some order.
> 
> I think the bug happens to be harmless in practice: It obviously only
> affects callers which pass a NULL domain, and AFAICT the only such
> caller is
> 
>   async_synchronize_full() ->
>   async_synchronize_full_domain(NULL) ->
>   async_synchronize_cookie_domain(ASYNC_COOKIE_MAX, NULL)
> 
> and the ASYNC_COOKIE_MAX means that in practice we end up waiting for
> the async_global_pending list to be empty - but it would break if
> somebody happened to pass (void*)-1 as the data element to
> async_schedule, and of course also if somebody ever does a
> async_synchronize_cookie_domain(, NULL) with a "finite" cookie value.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10+
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>

Ughh... indeed.

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Sorry about that.  Can you please resend the patch w/ Andrew Morton
cc'd?  I think it'd be best to route this through -mm.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-27 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-20 22:51 [PATCH] Revert "async: simplify lowest_in_progress()" Rasmus Villemoes
2017-11-20 22:59 ` Adam Wallis
2017-11-27 19:36 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-11-28 10:49 ` [PATCH resend] " Rasmus Villemoes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171127193637.GK983427@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.