From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754228AbdK2KRU (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:17:20 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55942 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754181AbdK2KRR (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:17:17 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:17:15 +0100 From: Greg KH To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, mfuzzey@parkeon.com, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dhowells@redhat.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.de, arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com, zajec5@gmail.com, nbroeking@me.com, markivx@codeaurora.org, stephen.boyd@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Abhay_Salunke@dell.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, jewalt@lgsinnovations.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/23] firmware: add helper to copy built-in data to pre-alloc buffer Message-ID: <20171129101715.GB29506@kroah.com> References: <20171120182409.27348-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20171120182409.27348-11-mcgrof@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171120182409.27348-11-mcgrof@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:23:56AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > This makes it clearer that the parameters passed are only used for > the preallocated buffer option, ie, when a caller uses: > > request_firmware_into_buf() > > Otherwise this code won't run. We flip the logic just so the actual > prellocated buf code is not indented. > > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez > --- > drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c > index 4f64410fe7e6..aba3f2cbe2f4 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c > +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c > @@ -146,6 +146,14 @@ static struct firmware_cache fw_cache; > extern struct builtin_fw __start_builtin_fw[]; > extern struct builtin_fw __end_builtin_fw[]; > > +static void fw_copy_to_prealloc_buf(struct firmware *fw, > + void *buf, size_t size) > +{ > + if (!buf || size < fw->size) > + return; Shouldn't this return an error? > + memcpy(buf, fw->data, fw->size); I'll take this, but it feels really odd...