From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 09:04:50 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 00/11] board: Add Allwinner A64/H5 boards In-Reply-To: References: <1509559553-26544-1-git-send-email-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20171203225110.319cc00e@windsurf.home> Message-ID: <20171204090450.04fa4466@windsurf.home> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:13:39 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > Since I was not super happy with this proposal to solve the ATF/U-Boot > > building problem for Allwinner A64/H5, I just submitted a different > > patch series (which re-uses some of your work, authorship preserved). > > Could you see what you think about my proposal ? > > Yes, this is what I proposed in previous versions[1], unfortunately ie > not moving further. Happy that now it has better shape to move. It is not trivial to solve this problem in a nice and pretty fashion, especially due to the ATF->U-Boot and U-Boot->ATF possible dependencies. So my proposal is a proposal I find better, but I don't pretend it's the perfection either. > > If my proposal gets merged, then it would be nice if you could rebase > > your defconfig patches on top of it. It's mainly a matter of adding a > > few more ATF options and tweaking U-Boot options. > > Yes, will do. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com