From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40842 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751069AbdLDROh (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:14:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:14:35 -0200 From: "Bruno E. O. Meneguele" To: Mimi Zohar Cc: dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update Message-ID: <20171204171435.GA6190@glitch> References: <20171201181522.GB3056@glitch> <1512392157.3977.36.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn" In-Reply-To: <1512392157.3977.36.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04-12, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 16:15 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I don't really know what are your best interest in update ima-evm-utils > > 1.0 package to support OpenSSL 1.1 new interface considering lots of > > distros are chaging to it as the default one. Some are maintaining > > compatibility packages to OpenSSL 1.0, but usually it remains available > > in the official repos for something like 1 or 2 releases and then > > removed completely. > > > > Actually I have a simple/small port of it to OpenSSL 1.1 that I plan to > > maintain for Fedora's Rawhide (next release, f28) package. Do you guys > > have interest on it? I could post it as a patch. > > > > Thanks! > > Yes, I'd really appreciate it. We need to release the new EVM > portable signature support as well. > Perfect! should I post with some different subject prefix or something like that to let things clear that is a patch for the userspace app? > thanks, > > Mimi > [ Part 2, Application/PGP-SIGNATURE (Name: "signature.asc") 499 bytes. ] [ Unable to print this part. ]