From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752213AbdLFOMB (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:12:01 -0500 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:58056 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751570AbdLFOMA (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:12:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 14:11:55 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Stefan Agner Cc: timur@tabi.org, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, fabio.estevam@nxp.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolin Chen , lgirdwood@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: protect macro argument Message-ID: <20171206141155.ytdmashkum3ujpvk@sirena.org.uk> References: <20170807063657.12581-1-stefan@agner.ch> <20170807070806.GA8208@Asurada> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwockcdss4ztkoqm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Money is its own reward. User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --rwockcdss4ztkoqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 02:53:39PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2017-08-07 09:08, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:36:57PM -0700, Stefan Agner wrote: > Mark, you seem to have merged other patches for this driver, can you > merge this one too? Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20 on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled. --rwockcdss4ztkoqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlon+qkACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Bbogf8CxMDO1vwwpNH8S0H0kC1c5e9bb9prelvdsqqW/ovPIWDK0OncGc6zNDq L1L/wdgEP3eT9CX9DzwkOMMPx6/VTjyzQnpbxAp1U22R/Y3SRjUU2hXdMjfat/4l CvBdHLLIEbbHOeotIV2QUW3VTwNWL4i4a6hNWpmYjfaAL9d24S5rjsofcZm58XCI BnfPImG9gy8E9lkYq2/GwrjNlzdjqOShGbgI8tfaABhuc1ddoQGenXr/TmMSd7Pv 20iRxBZBA8ljz3ONqc4dqVgk6NvIZPFvZOhB9/gVBiKUzrp5736a2t9Jh2I+7oZq EQmnQ4eEKWRBH+0xXNN+dgHBcB8tHg== =TdLN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwockcdss4ztkoqm--