From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33659 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751718AbdLGADA (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2017 19:03:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 01:02:59 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove "no-allocation" reservations for file creations Message-ID: <20171207000259.GA18701@lst.de> References: <20170821082404.3387-1-hch@lst.de> <20170823202213.GA4796@magnolia> <20170824004755.GC21024@dastard> <20170829180445.GU4757@magnolia> <20170903072513.GA14807@lst.de> <20170903153150.GE4073@magnolia> <20171205013422.GC19219@magnolia> <20171205185936.GE19219@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171205185936.GE19219@magnolia> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:59:36AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > I fixed most of the auto group regressions with small fixes to xfstests, > but xfs/013 is a problem because once we run out of space to create new > dirX we simply get nothing. Will have to study the behavior of that > test in more depth... With what kind of config do you see xfs/013 failures?