From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752498AbdLGJY5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 7 Dec 2017 04:24:57 -0500
Received: from mail-pg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.83.51]:45460 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752447AbdLGJYy (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 7 Dec 2017 04:24:54 -0500
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYxoesrtaQhqp+RoFIE4XMOzUoMLU/XzROI7oK2B+QIt7vQWD1O7uFZ1bEsuq/Qg29W0f+oxg==
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:54:49 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ignore sugov kthreads
Message-ID: <20171207092449.hncv4aldaum5wivg@vireshk-mac-ubuntu>
References: <20171130114723.29210-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
 <20171130114723.29210-7-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
 <20171130134155.GF9903@localhost.localdomain>
 <20171130160234.GG31247@e110439-lin>
 <20171130161220.GK9903@localhost.localdomain>
 <20171130164237.GI31247@e110439-lin>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171130164237.GI31247@e110439-lin>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 30-11-17, 16:42, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> On 30-Nov 17:12, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Not sure about this though, not my call :). I guess this still helps
> > until we get the DL changes in.
> 
> Yes, agree... well Viresh had some concerns about this patch.
> Let see what he thinks.

And the problem is that we never got to a conclusion in V2 for this
patch as well, as you never responded to the last set of queries I
had. Unless we finish the ongoing conversations, we will have the same
queries again.

IOW, can you explain the exact scenario where this patch will be
helpful ? I am not sure if this patch is that helpful at all :)

-- 
viresh